freedom with Purposes? Widow's parliamentary group in the Future and Freedom? We know that some of our "little liberal world" - readers, authors and supporters of freedom - and skeptical of this choice. The respect that you need for the opinions of others, and especially to the views of those who is closer, is that you will spend a bit 'of words on why - by liberals - have adhered to the political and parliamentary Gianfranco Fini . In what Benedetto Della Vedova wrote yesterday and the day before yesterday Carmelo Palma, I try to add a few words from the bottom of the story, an excerpt of the document from the Office Presidency of the PDL on Thursday evening
Hon. Purposes and some of the MPs who refer to him have consistently provided guidance and even proposed legislation on issues such as citizenship qualifying short and non-voting to that conflict openly with the program that most solemnly signed with voters.
short, in the largest center-right party believe that it is appropriate to reduce the time to acquire the right to Italian citizenship, even for those born in Italy, and to allow voting in local elections to all residents, basically on the basis of taxation and not citizenship, is officially open to criticism. Do not "minority" and even politically "inappropriate", but even so conflicts with the program of the PDL to represent a cause of political incompatibility between those who have these ideas and the PDL.
time to our shoulders, and back over the past eighteen or twenty-four months of political life of the center, we see lives and unresolved ruptures between this PDL and our idea of \u200b\u200bfreedom, land and politics: the exploitation of the case and Englaro living will, a narrative of the economy based on the principle of "all right, we are made better than others," the slogan of cover for inaction and daily survival strategy (no reform, only make-up purpose surveys), the promiscuity with some satraps illiberal in the world - from Putin to Gaddafi through Lukashenko - a distant relative while certainly legitimate and realpolitik foreign atlantism that inspired the Berlusconi government 2001-2006; the "outsourcing" all 'outside of some crucial issues for the life of society (the Northern League, fiscal federalism, the fight against illegal immigration and the policies for Urban Safety, the Bishops' Conference on Bioethics and civil rights), the logic of emergence at high method of government, and the feeling of occupation policy Tg1, so different from the relationship that Berlusconi had been able to have in the past with the information and so similar to the antiberlusconismo was painting in the past, a pillar of our ideas - the guarantor - used as a justification of impunity of the powerful, and never the opposite, however, the justicialism practiced against beggars (read crime of illegal immigration and the like).
on these issues in this period of time, freedom has crossed - not coincidentally - Gianfranco Fini and his small but rich and problematic cultural galaxy.
We are grateful to Silvio Berlusconi for a long time for customs clearance in Italy the "liberal revolution", but sixteen years for the change always announced, often electorally "recapitalized" practiced and never have sapped the hopes first and then the nerves of the constituency of our ideas. Berlusconi has disappointed the expectations that we liberals are a toad swallowing a little 'how many times we said, really? To the samples, who among us has not reacted with a mixture of regret and skepticism last revival on amending Article 41 of the Constitution, and so on repeated promises to cut other taxes or IRAP? How much distance between "Fear and Hope" and the economic program tremontiana Martino of 1994 or even the reform (also tremontiana) IRPEF 2003?
And here the question of many is: "And with Fini everything will be different?". If skepticism is always understandable and legitimate, it is less a reflection of who judges a leader and his initiative on the basis of "political DNA" and not on facts of reality and actuality. E 'wrong, in the opinion of the writer, "decode" Fini, not for its political present, but its past now sufficiently remote. Especially since this past, inexplicably, for Fini would be a punishment, and others - from the Knight - an acquittal. We pretend to say that Fini's party has in mind that we thought (or maybe hoped) to be able to create a party open, modern and plural that looks the best experiences of European and American center. Not the "Liberal Party" - fortunately or unfortunately, but that's another story - but a big party for the open society, where our ideas can actively contribute to building a modern and serious programmatic platform facing the majority of voters .
PS. Freedom will always herself (and to make matters worse at the top of the browser window hours read: Libertiamo.it - \u200b\u200bIdeas for a liberal policy, liberal and libertarian). Pain in the ass pain in the ass and we remain.
Libertiamo.it SPREAD!
Submitted by:
Piercamillo Falasca - Born in Sarno in 1980, graduated in Economics at Bocconi is a fellow of Istituto Bruno Leoni, for which deals with fiscal policies, market opening and the South. He was one of the creators of Epistemes.org. E 'vice president of Liberty. He wrote, with Charles Lottieri, "How federalism could save the South" (2008, Rubbettino) and edited "After! - Recipes for the post-crisis" (2009, IBL Books).
CREDITS: Libertia
0 comments:
Post a Comment