The criticism in this newspaper for membership of the group Benedetto Della Vedova and Future of Freedom stem from an assumption: that Fini is not a liberal. Not for history and education. And this is certainly not new. The result obtained by the readers of argument, however, is that Fini, liberal, never will be. The composite formation formed on parliamentary His initiative would appear, therefore, as a monstrous incubator quell'assistenzial aennina-statist tradition in the birth of the PDL was finally handed over the remains to the cemetery of the fallen (ideological) twentieth century.
that assumption, in the opinion of the writer is factually unfounded. For at least two reasons. The first is the intellectual journey taken by Fini in the past three decades. Former MSI arrived to welcome the innovative and trans-ideological influences of modern European Right (from Rajoy Sarkozy Cameron). The transition from the conservative 'law and order' in the battles (liberal) civil liberties, citizenship rights, the ethically sensitive issues. Battles for which - we recall - Fini ended up paying the price of isolation and dell'abiura by his own party. That party, the PDL is not by chance born with the word 'freedom' in its name!
The second reason why we believe the complaints raised by the Friends readers deserve to be brought back to a more rational weighting is that, in the future and Freedom, Della Vedova is as liberal. There is so militant that mission where everyone here, staff and friends of Liberty players, we feel our role in each invested.
line of freedom, as reiterated Piercamillo Falasca, does not change.
critical positions, as guaranteed Pasquale Annichino continue to be encouraged. Personally
surplus food for thought to the reader more.
I think the perspective opened with the birth of the Future is for Freedom and Liberty strategically, culturally and politically profitable. I believe that the cause of freedom will at last be done within the center, that the League has done for the cause of the North: not one but 'the' battle to recover its mission primitive government action. And because this is basically need one thing: that the liberal vision will become - I will pass the call Gramsci - 'hegemonic'.
prosaically, I believe that with the birth and the Future of Freedom offers a chance at freedom - a pure wishful thinking in the party leader of the voiceless - to pull the blade of the reasons liberals.
The goal that freedom has pursued in recent years - due consideration of the compass, as well as political action, right of center along the route (sometimes left, sometimes beaten too timidly) the reduction of the state in economy and society Italian - in the opinion of the writer seems so close, with the 'sparigliamento' of the PDL, not annihilate. Do not get lost in a hazy return aennina to pre-modernity. On what basis
understand this reasoning? Well, on one point: the role assumed by Della Vedova in the new parliamentary group. A new political clout for a liberal, not at all obvious and, therefore, not at all without the same costs that Della Vedova will have the duty to honor, not only with the greatest responsibility in parliamentary activity, but also, I you deserve it for all of us realize that 'militant liberty' that we put trust in him shall not fail to put to it.
optional so this reasoning to a 'but' that - recognition - more than any is provided diriment. The Future Group and Liberty, though for now confined only to parliamentary action, it must now clarify - is a unique and possibly early - what are your priorities. What, that is, the goals towards which guide (and give coherence) to political activity in the months to come will be based, inevitably, the confrontation with the government majority.
is necessary that the contribution will Fli government agenda is substantial, and substantially oriented priority commitments for the country (as well as for voters to center): liberalization and reform the federal state, the radical change in relationship between bureaucracy and citizens and between tax authorities and businesses. Priority is to reduce weight and extension of the state, priority eliminate pockets of lawlessness that lurk in hypertrophy regulations (too many laws, no law: it is in the far west that lives the real country. And this is no longer tolerable, and not only in ethical terms but - even and especially - the aberrant effects on the national economy). Priority to the south the dictionary of responsibility, beginning to talk to people, not to the establishment stubbornly anchored to the preservation of the public as a necessity
These are the priorities of Finian? If you say that and are committed to pursuing them.
Future and Freedom will fail if it is unable to be nothing but a group 'against'. Will, on the contrary, if it is able to act in the government as a 'lobby' libertarian, the bearer of those interests to modernize and reform which the PDL was guilty of far too dull.
is a challenge, that of Fli. It is a challenge that involves a good deal of wisdom, wit and even strategic determination. This freedom can make a decisive contribution. Continuing to do essentially what was done with solid consistency so far, confident, as always, the key role - critical, challenging - of its readers.
Simona Bonfante - 37 years, Sicilian journalist and blogger, has taken the bones of a political analyst in New Labour circles during the years of Tony Blair. After a period in France to discover the rupture sarkozienne, has recently returned to Milan where, in addition to writing for various newspapers online, is also involved in political communication, mostly as a ghostwriter.
CREDITS: Libertia
0 comments:
Post a Comment