- I feel too singles today.
- What has changed from the other days?
- It 's changed the fact that others have passed, my friend ...
Music on air: Giuseppe di Stefano - Parlami d'amore Mariù
Wednesday, September 29, 2010
Look Like Jibjab Free
It starts with the party. Finally! Case
Gianmario Mariniello
You've asked a lot in recent months. "But the party do it or not". Well, today, after the Chairman of the Council, there was a meeting of all MPs and the Future of Freedom - the presence of Gianfranco Fini - and the answer to your question is finally here: "Yes, we do."
Next week there will be the first meeting of what will be the Organizing Committee, composed at this early stage by all members of parliament - without exception - have adhered to FLI.
E 'berthing essential, natural and inevitable that that was, is and will be difficult political adventure, thrilling, exciting and forward-looking, who cares about only one interest: the Italians. Who dream of a better country, united and proud of itself, with strong public ethic and a concept of legality is shared by all. Italy free of the caste, the cliques, mafias. An Italy that gives opportunities for their children, an Italy where the state is limited to play (well) its core tasks and only those, then lascindo space to oneself, fantasy, young people, those who want to play the game of his life.
To do all this and more, is a party. True, free, open, plural. What should have been and was not the PDL. A party based on merit, where militancy, commitment, consensus and administrative capacities in the territory count. Seriously. A party where the leading bodies are selected by the Congress and not with the nomination. A new party, other, looking to the future. A party that will use the web not only to communicate but also to involve, consult and "feel" members, militants and sympathizers.
is to do all this requires the commitment of all. We we can do it. For Italy. Future and Freedom
CREDITS: Generation Italy 
Gianmario Mariniello
You've asked a lot in recent months. "But the party do it or not". Well, today, after the Chairman of the Council, there was a meeting of all MPs and the Future of Freedom - the presence of Gianfranco Fini - and the answer to your question is finally here: "Yes, we do."
Next week there will be the first meeting of what will be the Organizing Committee, composed at this early stage by all members of parliament - without exception - have adhered to FLI.
E 'berthing essential, natural and inevitable that that was, is and will be difficult political adventure, thrilling, exciting and forward-looking, who cares about only one interest: the Italians. Who dream of a better country, united and proud of itself, with strong public ethic and a concept of legality is shared by all. Italy free of the caste, the cliques, mafias. An Italy that gives opportunities for their children, an Italy where the state is limited to play (well) its core tasks and only those, then lascindo space to oneself, fantasy, young people, those who want to play the game of his life.
To do all this and more, is a party. True, free, open, plural. What should have been and was not the PDL. A party based on merit, where militancy, commitment, consensus and administrative capacities in the territory count. Seriously. A party where the leading bodies are selected by the Congress and not with the nomination. A new party, other, looking to the future. A party that will use the web not only to communicate but also to involve, consult and "feel" members, militants and sympathizers.
is to do all this requires the commitment of all. We we can do it. For Italy. Future and Freedom
CREDITS: Generation Italy
Sunday, September 26, 2010
Word Used Incontribution Card
Pulp
I wake up in the toilet. It seems like a month that are in here judging by the stench of aloneness.
Groggy from sleep as I was rediscovering my sleepwalking with the unconscious and that suggests to me that the intestines are more important than the rest of the rest. Or perhaps more importantly do not let me wake up in a bed of dirty shit. It would be the material realization of my life: I blessed that I sleep in disgust that I myself have come out all by himself.
I wake up I still have his hand before his eyes. I turned on the light even before I sat down. My skin tells me that the process is smaller than my ass and my hand greater than my forehead. The palm and the index covers my eyes flowing like a river seen from a satellite: the move, although it seems to stop. I feel the elbow resting on his thigh in the head and the echo of my last thoughts. I do, I do, I do ...?
I take toilet paper and read it. There is no written anything yet. I use it and here I find myself in your hands one of those cards that are fortune cookies in China when the waiters remember to bring one. I know that there is blood, they told me the tears that wet my hand.
Seeking the sun with myopic eyes of those who have their glasses and no, it's still too early. I'm the only one to think so. All the doctors say it is too late: there's no one around me here
Shhh ... details.
Disclaimer
Just who is the health, right? After the break a month I'm back in style. And if you do not understand how big you can see that you have not paid attention to all the times I had to pull the drain.
Welcome back to me!
Music on air: Klink - Diamond
Saturday, September 25, 2010
Xmascards Interactive
case. Talk Fini
Here is the full text of Fini
Unfortunately for some time the spectacle of politics is simply depressing. For weeks, no mention of the many problems of the Italians, but almost solely to the center of furious infighting. Since July 29th I was actually expelled from the People of Liberty with ridiculous accusations, most notably that of being in league with the prosecutors to bring down Berlusconi's government is playing an obsessive political campaign to force a journalist to resign by President room, as we all know that can not be any form of censure Member. Obviously someone is bothering you right that you speak of a culture of legality, law equal for all, to guarantee that there can be no impunity, justice reform for the citizens and not to solve personal problems.
In 27 years of Parliament and 20 at the head of my party have never been touched by suspicions of wrongdoing and have never received even a simple notice of. I think I'm one of the few if not the only one, given the many storms that have affected the judicial politics in recent years. It is clear that if I was involved in a scandal it would have been nice to ask the most difficult policy to give itself a code of ethics and would be more credible to ask my resignation. So someone must have thought, for example, who advocated a method Boffo for me, or who advised me in the columns of the Berlusconi family newspaper to fall into line if I wanted to check some files - text - even on me, "because today it is for the Prime Minister, tomorrow it could tap to the Speaker of the House. " Prophecy or threat? Sure enough, after a while, 'Monaco has broken the deal. I know I need to Italians, and not only those who has always given me confidence, clarity and transparency in this regard.
The facts: An, over time, has inherited a number of buildings. Among these, in 1999, the famous Monte Carlo, which is not a palace even though he is a prince, 50-55 square meters, estimated about 230 000 €. Being in dilapidated conditions and almost entirely useless for the task of the party, on 11 July 2008 was sold to the Company Printemps, by Giancarlo segnalatami Tulliani. The document was signed by the administrative secretary, Senator Derrick delegated to me, a true gentleman who has run flawlessly for 20 years the assets of the party, and the lords and Izel Walfenzao. The price of the sale, € 300 000, was the subject of much of the summer hit. From my office was considered adequate because it exceeded 30 per cent of the value estimated by the real estate company Monaco, which administers the entire building.
You could negotiate a higher price? Possibly. It was a light? Maybe. In any case, since the prosecutor of Rome has dutifully opened an investigation against unknown persons, following a complaint by two political opponents, and because, unlike others, does not scream against the judiciary, I look forward to the outcome of investigations. As I have pointed out, only after the sale I knew I lived in that house, Mr. Giancarlo Tulliani. The fact caused me un'arrabbiatura colossal, although he told me he was paying a regular lease and had paid the costs of restructuring. I could not force him to leave, but of course I asked him with anything but polite tones. I hope it does, if it were nothing more than to return a bit 'of peace to my family.
It was written, but why sell it to an offshore company, which is based in Saint Lucia, a so-called tax haven? Their argument makes sense, but in Monaco the off shore are the rule rather than the exception. And mind you, personally I have no money, no boats or houses made out to offshore companies, unlike others who have used, and use these companies to better protect their family assets or business and to pay less taxes. I was wrong? With hindsight I have to blame ingenuity. But, mind you: it was not committing any crime, it was not causing any harm to anyone. And it is even more clear in this matter is not involved the administration of public affairs or the taxpayer's money. There are no contracts or bribes, no corruption or extortion. That's it? As far as I know all.
course I also ask myself, and I have every right as the uproar that has been unleashed upon me: who is the true owner of the house of Monte Carlo? You Giancarlo Tulliani, as many think? I do not know. I asked with insistence: he has always vehemently denied, in public and in private. There remain doubts? Of course, even to me. And if it emerges with certainty that Tulliani is the owner and that my good faith has been betrayed, I would not hesitate to leave the presidency of the Chamber. Not for personal responsibility - that there are - but because my public ethics require me. Of course, in this ugly dark pages of history there are many, too many. A private business has become an affair of state for political and media obsession campaign to discredit my person: the campaign has made use of rumors, innuendo, slander ye say newspapers and center-fed by people and turbid disqualified.
I do not think our intelligence services, whose institutional loyalty is beyond dispute, as is the esteem I have read against the Secretary and the prefect De Gennaro. I think the plot of third-rate thriller that appear on sites Dominicans saw a letter from a minister of Saint Lucia, spread by a journalist from Ecuador, revived in Italy by a gossip site following the improbable reports of careful readers. I think a professional busybody, a walk in Central America for weeks (by the way, who pays the costs?) To find evidence of my alleged crime queen. I think the letter confidentially, except end worldwide, the Justice Minister of Saint Lucia has written to his Prime Minister because of the good name of the country concerned by the presence of company off shore is not involved in arms trafficking, drugs, currency, but a dangerous sale of a small apartment in Monaco. But having said all this with sadness, back to serious matters.
Freedom of information is the cornerstone of a democratic and open society. But for this, newspapers and television can not become instruments of a party, not used to provide news and comment, but to attack a political opponent at any cost. When you slip on this slope, the news are no longer the end but the means, the club. And when the news does not exist, you invent your own use and consumption. So, with the innuendo, in lies, with the dossier, with the politics reduced to a no holds barred fight to eliminate the opponent destroys democracy. It jeopardizes the future of libertà.Chi irresponsibly has fueled this game to stop the slaughter, let's all before it's too late. Let's stop thinking about the future of the country. Recall the comparison hard, as it should be, but civil and appropriate. The Italians expect the legislature continues to address problems and make their lives better. I hope that everyone, from the Prime Minister, the same view. If it is not, the Italians will judge. And, as far as I'm concerned, I certainly have a clear conscience.
CREDITS: Century in Italy 
Here is the full text of Fini
Unfortunately for some time the spectacle of politics is simply depressing. For weeks, no mention of the many problems of the Italians, but almost solely to the center of furious infighting. Since July 29th I was actually expelled from the People of Liberty with ridiculous accusations, most notably that of being in league with the prosecutors to bring down Berlusconi's government is playing an obsessive political campaign to force a journalist to resign by President room, as we all know that can not be any form of censure Member. Obviously someone is bothering you right that you speak of a culture of legality, law equal for all, to guarantee that there can be no impunity, justice reform for the citizens and not to solve personal problems.
In 27 years of Parliament and 20 at the head of my party have never been touched by suspicions of wrongdoing and have never received even a simple notice of. I think I'm one of the few if not the only one, given the many storms that have affected the judicial politics in recent years. It is clear that if I was involved in a scandal it would have been nice to ask the most difficult policy to give itself a code of ethics and would be more credible to ask my resignation. So someone must have thought, for example, who advocated a method Boffo for me, or who advised me in the columns of the Berlusconi family newspaper to fall into line if I wanted to check some files - text - even on me, "because today it is for the Prime Minister, tomorrow it could tap to the Speaker of the House. " Prophecy or threat? Sure enough, after a while, 'Monaco has broken the deal. I know I need to Italians, and not only those who has always given me confidence, clarity and transparency in this regard.
The facts: An, over time, has inherited a number of buildings. Among these, in 1999, the famous Monte Carlo, which is not a palace even though he is a prince, 50-55 square meters, estimated about 230 000 €. Being in dilapidated conditions and almost entirely useless for the task of the party, on 11 July 2008 was sold to the Company Printemps, by Giancarlo segnalatami Tulliani. The document was signed by the administrative secretary, Senator Derrick delegated to me, a true gentleman who has run flawlessly for 20 years the assets of the party, and the lords and Izel Walfenzao. The price of the sale, € 300 000, was the subject of much of the summer hit. From my office was considered adequate because it exceeded 30 per cent of the value estimated by the real estate company Monaco, which administers the entire building.
You could negotiate a higher price? Possibly. It was a light? Maybe. In any case, since the prosecutor of Rome has dutifully opened an investigation against unknown persons, following a complaint by two political opponents, and because, unlike others, does not scream against the judiciary, I look forward to the outcome of investigations. As I have pointed out, only after the sale I knew I lived in that house, Mr. Giancarlo Tulliani. The fact caused me un'arrabbiatura colossal, although he told me he was paying a regular lease and had paid the costs of restructuring. I could not force him to leave, but of course I asked him with anything but polite tones. I hope it does, if it were nothing more than to return a bit 'of peace to my family.
It was written, but why sell it to an offshore company, which is based in Saint Lucia, a so-called tax haven? Their argument makes sense, but in Monaco the off shore are the rule rather than the exception. And mind you, personally I have no money, no boats or houses made out to offshore companies, unlike others who have used, and use these companies to better protect their family assets or business and to pay less taxes. I was wrong? With hindsight I have to blame ingenuity. But, mind you: it was not committing any crime, it was not causing any harm to anyone. And it is even more clear in this matter is not involved the administration of public affairs or the taxpayer's money. There are no contracts or bribes, no corruption or extortion. That's it? As far as I know all.
course I also ask myself, and I have every right as the uproar that has been unleashed upon me: who is the true owner of the house of Monte Carlo? You Giancarlo Tulliani, as many think? I do not know. I asked with insistence: he has always vehemently denied, in public and in private. There remain doubts? Of course, even to me. And if it emerges with certainty that Tulliani is the owner and that my good faith has been betrayed, I would not hesitate to leave the presidency of the Chamber. Not for personal responsibility - that there are - but because my public ethics require me. Of course, in this ugly dark pages of history there are many, too many. A private business has become an affair of state for political and media obsession campaign to discredit my person: the campaign has made use of rumors, innuendo, slander ye say newspapers and center-fed by people and turbid disqualified.
I do not think our intelligence services, whose institutional loyalty is beyond dispute, as is the esteem I have read against the Secretary and the prefect De Gennaro. I think the plot of third-rate thriller that appear on sites Dominicans saw a letter from a minister of Saint Lucia, spread by a journalist from Ecuador, revived in Italy by a gossip site following the improbable reports of careful readers. I think a professional busybody, a walk in Central America for weeks (by the way, who pays the costs?) To find evidence of my alleged crime queen. I think the letter confidentially, except end worldwide, the Justice Minister of Saint Lucia has written to his Prime Minister because of the good name of the country concerned by the presence of company off shore is not involved in arms trafficking, drugs, currency, but a dangerous sale of a small apartment in Monaco. But having said all this with sadness, back to serious matters.
Freedom of information is the cornerstone of a democratic and open society. But for this, newspapers and television can not become instruments of a party, not used to provide news and comment, but to attack a political opponent at any cost. When you slip on this slope, the news are no longer the end but the means, the club. And when the news does not exist, you invent your own use and consumption. So, with the innuendo, in lies, with the dossier, with the politics reduced to a no holds barred fight to eliminate the opponent destroys democracy. It jeopardizes the future of libertà.Chi irresponsibly has fueled this game to stop the slaughter, let's all before it's too late. Let's stop thinking about the future of the country. Recall the comparison hard, as it should be, but civil and appropriate. The Italians expect the legislature continues to address problems and make their lives better. I hope that everyone, from the Prime Minister, the same view. If it is not, the Italians will judge. And, as far as I'm concerned, I certainly have a clear conscience.
CREDITS: Century in Italy
Thursday, September 16, 2010
Starting My Own Day Of Coordination Business
Memories in the Dark free ebook! ¡Tu
are now available for free download in pdf format., the numbers published in the legendary horror fanzine designed by Matteo Poropat Trieste. Together they contain some of my best stories. You can download directly from the link below. Do not miss it! Domenico Nigro
Memories in the Dark free ebook! 
are now available for free download in pdf format., the numbers published in the legendary horror fanzine designed by Matteo Poropat Trieste. Together they contain some of my best stories. You can download directly from the link below. Do not miss it! Domenico Nigro
Memories in the Dark free ebook!
Wednesday, September 15, 2010
How Good Is The Burton Triad
the pagaràs! (Marilù Oliva - Elliot Edizioni)
Marilu Oliva, the pagaràs ¡Tu!
Elliot Edizioni, series shots, pp. 274, € 16.50 ISBN 978-88-6192-199-3
Bologna today.
bailarinos The community of Latin American dance is a reality unto itself. Bonfire of the Vanities, where many try to make room for themselves and show off, to hide the emptiness that you carry inside. Burst of violent passions, jealousy uncontrollable, unspeakable desires. Catalyst for moral decay but also the beauty, purity and desire for freedom and love, that only certain rhythms and certain movements can be expressed. Living library of magical invocations and evocations: here every act, every intention, every thought is magic in some way. That's why Caribbean dance are so closely linked to the syncretic deity of Cuban Santeria, the Orishas. So when the Noche, one of the temples and salsa Bolognese community bachatero is consumed a heinous, heinous crime, it soon becomes clear that the crime occurs powerful ritual connotations.
The investigations are very complex inspector Basilica, italomeridionale version of the more famous colleague overseas Lieutenant Colombo, a concentration of taboo "southerners" and wit sbirresca galore. Investigations more difficult, since the community bailarina is almost impossible to understand unless it is part. And, among other things, the inspector Basilica has an authentic idiosyncrasy for each type of dance. In addition, there are so many suspects, but the motives appear weak.
Fortunately, the inspector Basilica received an important aid in the investigation right from what might be the No. 1 suspect: Elisa Guerra, called La Guerrera, girlfriend of the victim.
dissatisfied Journalist (writes shabby for a local magazine, conducted by a dark and ruthless character), a student criminology, practitioner of capoeira (the famous Brazilian martial art that combines dance and fight), excellent salsa, girl character and indomitable rebel, a lover of sex practiced in its most sublime (he has the gift of cocomordàn ... but do not expect that we will explain what it is; D ...). The Guerrera becomes almost immediately a key contributor to the inspector's Basilica, among other things, forced to navigate between his innate snobbish el'invaghimento creeping for sensual girl.
Yet surveys seem to go a step forward and two steps back, and in the meantime we will run away another violent death, all the more inexplicable than the first, and the darkness seems to become even more dense.
Until Catalina, flatmate and adventures of Guerrera, sensitive guy and among other things, he decides to consult his Tarot of Love, slowly bringing to light a reality unimaginable and terrifying, in a whirlwind of magic, revenge, sex and passion extreme deflected ...
This new novel by Marilu Oliva is not simply a great film noir. It is not just an excellent example of metaphysical yellow. Marilu explains, and there unfolds before our eyes a world of fantasy, for the chosen few. He shows us otherwise lived passions of classical and obsolete for us Europeans, son of an old Even older continent, ancient and mummified. It speaks of sensuality and sexuality alien to us. He gives us a modern fable and valuable, to enjoy page after page. And there the shows with a freshness of style that has not equal.
Some time ago, reviewing his first work "Repetita," ventured the undersigned of combinations with other known examples of noir literature by women. Today, she realizes it was wrong big time. Marilu Oliva can not be compared to anyone, his style is unique. And one must remember that this author is only the second test on the "long distance" literary
... Now we just have to wait mid-October, when Marilu will be in Milan to present his masterpiece, Ca 'Shadow
will have the opportunity to interview her live and signed crown at last the dream of stealing a sauce! It will be like to steal Guerrera in person, woooooowwwww
... (review by) Domenico Nigro 
Marilu Oliva, the pagaràs ¡Tu!
Elliot Edizioni, series shots, pp. 274, € 16.50 ISBN 978-88-6192-199-3
Bologna today.
bailarinos The community of Latin American dance is a reality unto itself. Bonfire of the Vanities, where many try to make room for themselves and show off, to hide the emptiness that you carry inside. Burst of violent passions, jealousy uncontrollable, unspeakable desires. Catalyst for moral decay but also the beauty, purity and desire for freedom and love, that only certain rhythms and certain movements can be expressed. Living library of magical invocations and evocations: here every act, every intention, every thought is magic in some way. That's why Caribbean dance are so closely linked to the syncretic deity of Cuban Santeria, the Orishas. So when the Noche, one of the temples and salsa Bolognese community bachatero is consumed a heinous, heinous crime, it soon becomes clear that the crime occurs powerful ritual connotations.
The investigations are very complex inspector Basilica, italomeridionale version of the more famous colleague overseas Lieutenant Colombo, a concentration of taboo "southerners" and wit sbirresca galore. Investigations more difficult, since the community bailarina is almost impossible to understand unless it is part. And, among other things, the inspector Basilica has an authentic idiosyncrasy for each type of dance. In addition, there are so many suspects, but the motives appear weak.
Fortunately, the inspector Basilica received an important aid in the investigation right from what might be the No. 1 suspect: Elisa Guerra, called La Guerrera, girlfriend of the victim.
dissatisfied Journalist (writes shabby for a local magazine, conducted by a dark and ruthless character), a student criminology, practitioner of capoeira (the famous Brazilian martial art that combines dance and fight), excellent salsa, girl character and indomitable rebel, a lover of sex practiced in its most sublime (he has the gift of cocomordàn ... but do not expect that we will explain what it is; D ...). The Guerrera becomes almost immediately a key contributor to the inspector's Basilica, among other things, forced to navigate between his innate snobbish el'invaghimento creeping for sensual girl.
Yet surveys seem to go a step forward and two steps back, and in the meantime we will run away another violent death, all the more inexplicable than the first, and the darkness seems to become even more dense.
Until Catalina, flatmate and adventures of Guerrera, sensitive guy and among other things, he decides to consult his Tarot of Love, slowly bringing to light a reality unimaginable and terrifying, in a whirlwind of magic, revenge, sex and passion extreme deflected ...
This new novel by Marilu Oliva is not simply a great film noir. It is not just an excellent example of metaphysical yellow. Marilu explains, and there unfolds before our eyes a world of fantasy, for the chosen few. He shows us otherwise lived passions of classical and obsolete for us Europeans, son of an old Even older continent, ancient and mummified. It speaks of sensuality and sexuality alien to us. He gives us a modern fable and valuable, to enjoy page after page. And there the shows with a freshness of style that has not equal.
Some time ago, reviewing his first work "Repetita," ventured the undersigned of combinations with other known examples of noir literature by women. Today, she realizes it was wrong big time. Marilu Oliva can not be compared to anyone, his style is unique. And one must remember that this author is only the second test on the "long distance" literary
... Now we just have to wait mid-October, when Marilu will be in Milan to present his masterpiece, Ca 'Shadow
will have the opportunity to interview her live and signed crown at last the dream of stealing a sauce! It will be like to steal Guerrera in person, woooooowwwww
... (review by) Domenico Nigro
Tuesday, September 14, 2010
Outlook Express Spam Error 554
Nightmare 2010 (Samuel Bayer)
Nightmare is a reboot of the famous film by Wes Craven, directed by Samuel Bayer and published in Italian cinemas August 25, 2010. It is one of the most highly anticipated reboot arrived in theaters after another remake or reboot as many classic horror, that have affected the consciousness of the lovers and do not like that (among whom are 13 and Friday Halloween The Beginning).
certainly experiment with material and so important that launched an icon like this has been difficult enough task.
In fact, the plot, quite inadequate especially in the characterization of the protagonists, good or evil that follows the 1984 film. Dean (Kellan Lutz), a high school student, finds himself in a bar with the girl who attends or Kris (Katie Cassidy), explaining that it suffers from recurring nightmares, however, seem that much, maybe too real. In these nightmares, the boy sees a monstrous creature, his face horribly disfigured, that instead of a hand of the metal claws and tries to kill him in the most heinous possible. Dean does not sleep for several days so he falls asleep for a few minutes at the bar and in front of the dazed Nancy (played by the maid of the bar Rooney Mara that soon we will see another remake all-American, that 'Men Who Hate Women') and his girlfriend, cut her throat with a knife while still asleep. Everyone thinks obviously a suicide even though Nancy has a different theory on what happened. In fact, even the young suffer from recurring nightmares where there is this disturbing figure that seems to haunt her and give her peace. He would like to talk with her friend Kris but fails and in fact the latter, will be the next victim of the monster dreams. Obviously, the plot continues on this path of nightmares and murders that occur during sleep, in the now famous Elm Street, in a delusional and hell-downs that has little to add to the original plot ...
In fact, this was the first feature with which he has experimented with the director (remember that he directed the video for Nirvana Smells like teen spirits) and, although I have studied in some depth the visual department, as regards the rest, added to the big news monster Robert Englund is famous in the horror landscape. Jackie Earle Haley (already seen in the role of Rorschach in Watchmen) certainly gave great proof of his mastery in a character that on one hand has become even more monstrous and sadistic but on the other hand has lost that sense of irony that had Englund of Nightmare, making it different from other serial killers. The Department of the young actors (among whom are Kyle Gallner already seen in Jennifer's body and that the Emmett Kellan Lutz of Twilight series) is not very expressive and a little 'problem' bringing to mind, in the context where they are located, movies decorated with bows or TV show for teenagers rather than a horror movie. The film, however, has managed to achieve substantial results at the box office (earned one hundred and eleven million approximately $ ...) and this has only served to produce a sequel that will make richer the now famous producer Michael Bay, but the poor will become increasingly global landscape of horror.
There is little else to add to this Nightmare 2010 unfortunately saw that it was certainly one of the most successful reboot (indeed perhaps the least successful of all the others). We only hope that in the sequel, something new is added to the plot and characters even though they strongly doubt ...
(Review by) Susan Angelino
Title
A Nightmare on Elm Street (2010)
Director: Samuel Bayer
Screenplay: Wesley Strick
Eric Heisserer
Subject:
Wes Craven (characters)
Cast: Jackie Earle Haley
: Freddy Krueger
Kyle Gallner: Quentin Thomas Dekker
: Jesse
Kellan Lutz: Dean
Rooney Mara, Nancy
Katie Cassidy: Kris
Clancy Brown: Alan Smith
Connie Britton: Dr. Gwen Holbrook
Case Production: New Line Cinema
Platinum Dunes
Production:
Michael Bay (Producer)
Andrew Form (Producer)
Brad Fuller (Producer )
Mike Drake (Executive Producer)
Michael Lynne (Executive Producer)
John Rickard (Co-Producer)
Robert Shaye (Executive Producer)
Editor: Glen Scantlebury
Photography: Jeff Cutter
Production Designer: Patrick Lumb
Costumes: Mari-An Ceo
Original Music: Steve Jablonsky
Nightmare is a reboot of the famous film by Wes Craven, directed by Samuel Bayer and published in Italian cinemas August 25, 2010. It is one of the most highly anticipated reboot arrived in theaters after another remake or reboot as many classic horror, that have affected the consciousness of the lovers and do not like that (among whom are 13 and Friday Halloween The Beginning).
certainly experiment with material and so important that launched an icon like this has been difficult enough task.
In fact, the plot, quite inadequate especially in the characterization of the protagonists, good or evil that follows the 1984 film. Dean (Kellan Lutz), a high school student, finds himself in a bar with the girl who attends or Kris (Katie Cassidy), explaining that it suffers from recurring nightmares, however, seem that much, maybe too real. In these nightmares, the boy sees a monstrous creature, his face horribly disfigured, that instead of a hand of the metal claws and tries to kill him in the most heinous possible. Dean does not sleep for several days so he falls asleep for a few minutes at the bar and in front of the dazed Nancy (played by the maid of the bar Rooney Mara that soon we will see another remake all-American, that 'Men Who Hate Women') and his girlfriend, cut her throat with a knife while still asleep. Everyone thinks obviously a suicide even though Nancy has a different theory on what happened. In fact, even the young suffer from recurring nightmares where there is this disturbing figure that seems to haunt her and give her peace. He would like to talk with her friend Kris but fails and in fact the latter, will be the next victim of the monster dreams. Obviously, the plot continues on this path of nightmares and murders that occur during sleep, in the now famous Elm Street, in a delusional and hell-downs that has little to add to the original plot ...
In fact, this was the first feature with which he has experimented with the director (remember that he directed the video for Nirvana Smells like teen spirits) and, although I have studied in some depth the visual department, as regards the rest, added to the big news monster Robert Englund is famous in the horror landscape. Jackie Earle Haley (already seen in the role of Rorschach in Watchmen) certainly gave great proof of his mastery in a character that on one hand has become even more monstrous and sadistic but on the other hand has lost that sense of irony that had Englund of Nightmare, making it different from other serial killers. The Department of the young actors (among whom are Kyle Gallner already seen in Jennifer's body and that the Emmett Kellan Lutz of Twilight series) is not very expressive and a little 'problem' bringing to mind, in the context where they are located, movies decorated with bows or TV show for teenagers rather than a horror movie. The film, however, has managed to achieve substantial results at the box office (earned one hundred and eleven million approximately $ ...) and this has only served to produce a sequel that will make richer the now famous producer Michael Bay, but the poor will become increasingly global landscape of horror.
There is little else to add to this Nightmare 2010 unfortunately saw that it was certainly one of the most successful reboot (indeed perhaps the least successful of all the others). We only hope that in the sequel, something new is added to the plot and characters even though they strongly doubt ...
(Review by) Susan Angelino
Title
A Nightmare on Elm Street (2010)
Director: Samuel Bayer
Screenplay: Wesley Strick
Eric Heisserer
Subject:
Wes Craven (characters)
Cast: Jackie Earle Haley
: Freddy Krueger
Kyle Gallner: Quentin Thomas Dekker
: Jesse
Kellan Lutz: Dean
Rooney Mara, Nancy
Katie Cassidy: Kris
Clancy Brown: Alan Smith
Connie Britton: Dr. Gwen Holbrook
Case Production: New Line Cinema
Platinum Dunes
Production:
Michael Bay (Producer)
Andrew Form (Producer)
Brad Fuller (Producer )
Mike Drake (Executive Producer)
Michael Lynne (Executive Producer)
John Rickard (Co-Producer)
Robert Shaye (Executive Producer)
Editor: Glen Scantlebury
Photography: Jeff Cutter
Production Designer: Patrick Lumb
Costumes: Mari-An Ceo
Original Music: Steve Jablonsky
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Journal Gene Medicine Impact Factor
The beautiful country without the conservatives
Luca GERON
Avvenire, 30.3.2000 .
The evil Italians and non-political development of the end of '800: a debate today in Rome.
Serving Giolitti? Rudini tried to give solution to the Italian processor
Fonzi: "without the contribution of the people"
Conservative without a party, and if the fault was of Giolitti? Well, if Italy Risorgimento, that of historical right and left dying - by the book - with the guns of Light Beccaris in Milan, the Giolitti era that was to open, as well as the cradle of the transformer, of early industrialization and of the moderate cleric, was also the tomb of the Conservative Party Italian. Thus the pathology of the Italian political system, incapable of an alternation between two major factions in accordance with the purest Anglo-Saxon tradition, would find its origin in the failure of two tantitivi close together to create a conservative party rival in a Liberal Democratic Party. We share your
then gunshots from the Bava Beccaris, or rather from that of Marquis Antonio Rudini then head of government, branded as reactionary ephemeral, it turns out he tried during his first government (1891-93) "a delicate fillet operation of the moderate "open negotiations with the Vatican to obtain consent Catholic, "indispensable to the establishment of a conservative party in Italy." A political project, rediscovered by Paolo Carusi, now on display in "Pass the transformation. The first ministry of Rudin and the issue of new parties, "an attempt to combine with one hundred days of the government of Sidney Sonnino - another ill-treated by the memory - which in 1906 tried, by uniting Catholics and liberals transigenti anticlerical, to build an alternative right to Giolitti, lighted up by Umberto Gentiloni Silveri as in "Conservatives without a party. A failed attempt in the Italian Giolitti. A Conservative Party ever made, although in 1908 there were those who wrote the "Manifesto for a Conservative Party Italian. " A failure that "carries with it consequences and reflections that have more to do with the future development of Italy that the nineteenth-century conservative movement," writes Gentiloni Silveri. Two volumes rigorous and documented - both published by Studium and the center of a debate today Sturzo Institute of Rome's historical Fausto Fonzi, Ernesto Galli della Loggia, and Pietro Luigi Lotti Scoppola - presenting a summary unpublished, an 'inventive step' the origins of a very topical issue.
"The lack of a conservative party - says the Catholic historian Fausto Fonzi - was a reflection of the lack of participation of the Italian people in political life, in particular the absence of large the Catholics. "In short, the unresolved church-state relationship that formed in an unusual way compared to the rest of Europe the new political balance of the Italian early twentieth century. But according to Lorenzo Lotto, who teaches modern history at the University of Florence, In Rudin and Sonnino attempts were, however, unrealistic because "at least until 1994 the entire Italian political system has been conducted on a large gathering at the center. An Anglo-Saxon myth of the Risorgimento bipolarity that clashed with the reality of a sinister extremist Catholics and unrelated to the unitary state. The Conservative Party could not be born with Catholics in opposition of the liberal state. "Exceeding the non expedit - states in turn the historian Peter Scoppola - was not the condition for the formation of a strong moderate alignment, prevailed because instrumental use of the Catholic vote to help maintain the balance Giolitti against socialism. A policy of high-processed, but that made it impossible for the polarization of the system as happened in other countries where the conservative parties were born during the first industrialization of the agricultural world in defense of the religious world and closely related to it. "But in Italy, while in the decline of the liberal system of the nineteenth century mass parties picking up steam and social consensus, the middle class, obsessed with the risk of proletarianization, futurism, identified themselves culturally and politically with the nationalist movement. The outcome, also died out during the Giolitti, was the establishment of a new social bloc, formed by the middle classes and big business, which sustained Salandra and then entry into the war.
Conservative without a party, but without inheritance? "The credit for this attempt - Fonzi says - it was clear that it put a certain ideological line. A tradition of liberalism, the right, which can be traced back even that was Stephen Jacini teorizzzato the English political system and the Conservative Party national. A lost tradition, but high-profile moral remains a point of reference. " For
Scoppola instead the best part of the conservative tradition "was enhanced by Alcide De Gasperi, in a complicated situation of Catholics from the politics that conservatives of the century, thinking about a possible alliance with some of them, not posed. By contrast, the Catholic world was held together by the claims temporality and then by the defense of Catholic interests. A political space that can not find his own autonomy because dominated by sectarian concerns are legitimate, but which have prevailed on the dynamics of a society undergoing modernization.
few pennies of inheritance, according to Lotti, for conservative thought in the following of the century: "Some elements survived in the tradition of moderate liberalism, shocked by World War I and even overwhelmed by the second postwar period. "Defeated or subordinates in Giolittismo centrism and the Conservatives for Scoppola now have a new chance:" The political question at the end of this discussion is whether, Moro died out with every possible centrist synthesis, the time has come to a polarization of political where 'religious interests' are borne fairly by all Catholics in spite of political divisions. "A new political phase, also according to Lotti" in theory makes it possible not bipartisanship, but the bipolarity. One hypothesis is not unrealistic now, especially in an international novel. "I mean, held after the post-communist, the 'what' of the millennium could be the Conservative Party.
__________________
Italians are individual genes that form, together, a people politically disorganized and immature.
A community so amazing to make an overall problem. A. Lattuada
Luca GERON
Avvenire, 30.3.2000 .
The evil Italians and non-political development of the end of '800: a debate today in Rome.
Serving Giolitti? Rudini tried to give solution to the Italian processor
Fonzi: "without the contribution of the people"
Conservative without a party, and if the fault was of Giolitti? Well, if Italy Risorgimento, that of historical right and left dying - by the book - with the guns of Light Beccaris in Milan, the Giolitti era that was to open, as well as the cradle of the transformer, of early industrialization and of the moderate cleric, was also the tomb of the Conservative Party Italian. Thus the pathology of the Italian political system, incapable of an alternation between two major factions in accordance with the purest Anglo-Saxon tradition, would find its origin in the failure of two tantitivi close together to create a conservative party rival in a Liberal Democratic Party. We share your
then gunshots from the Bava Beccaris, or rather from that of Marquis Antonio Rudini then head of government, branded as reactionary ephemeral, it turns out he tried during his first government (1891-93) "a delicate fillet operation of the moderate "open negotiations with the Vatican to obtain consent Catholic, "indispensable to the establishment of a conservative party in Italy." A political project, rediscovered by Paolo Carusi, now on display in "Pass the transformation. The first ministry of Rudin and the issue of new parties, "an attempt to combine with one hundred days of the government of Sidney Sonnino - another ill-treated by the memory - which in 1906 tried, by uniting Catholics and liberals transigenti anticlerical, to build an alternative right to Giolitti, lighted up by Umberto Gentiloni Silveri as in "Conservatives without a party. A failed attempt in the Italian Giolitti. A Conservative Party ever made, although in 1908 there were those who wrote the "Manifesto for a Conservative Party Italian. " A failure that "carries with it consequences and reflections that have more to do with the future development of Italy that the nineteenth-century conservative movement," writes Gentiloni Silveri. Two volumes rigorous and documented - both published by Studium and the center of a debate today Sturzo Institute of Rome's historical Fausto Fonzi, Ernesto Galli della Loggia, and Pietro Luigi Lotti Scoppola - presenting a summary unpublished, an 'inventive step' the origins of a very topical issue.
"The lack of a conservative party - says the Catholic historian Fausto Fonzi - was a reflection of the lack of participation of the Italian people in political life, in particular the absence of large the Catholics. "In short, the unresolved church-state relationship that formed in an unusual way compared to the rest of Europe the new political balance of the Italian early twentieth century. But according to Lorenzo Lotto, who teaches modern history at the University of Florence, In Rudin and Sonnino attempts were, however, unrealistic because "at least until 1994 the entire Italian political system has been conducted on a large gathering at the center. An Anglo-Saxon myth of the Risorgimento bipolarity that clashed with the reality of a sinister extremist Catholics and unrelated to the unitary state. The Conservative Party could not be born with Catholics in opposition of the liberal state. "Exceeding the non expedit - states in turn the historian Peter Scoppola - was not the condition for the formation of a strong moderate alignment, prevailed because instrumental use of the Catholic vote to help maintain the balance Giolitti against socialism. A policy of high-processed, but that made it impossible for the polarization of the system as happened in other countries where the conservative parties were born during the first industrialization of the agricultural world in defense of the religious world and closely related to it. "But in Italy, while in the decline of the liberal system of the nineteenth century mass parties picking up steam and social consensus, the middle class, obsessed with the risk of proletarianization, futurism, identified themselves culturally and politically with the nationalist movement. The outcome, also died out during the Giolitti, was the establishment of a new social bloc, formed by the middle classes and big business, which sustained Salandra and then entry into the war.
Conservative without a party, but without inheritance? "The credit for this attempt - Fonzi says - it was clear that it put a certain ideological line. A tradition of liberalism, the right, which can be traced back even that was Stephen Jacini teorizzzato the English political system and the Conservative Party national. A lost tradition, but high-profile moral remains a point of reference. " For
Scoppola instead the best part of the conservative tradition "was enhanced by Alcide De Gasperi, in a complicated situation of Catholics from the politics that conservatives of the century, thinking about a possible alliance with some of them, not posed. By contrast, the Catholic world was held together by the claims temporality and then by the defense of Catholic interests. A political space that can not find his own autonomy because dominated by sectarian concerns are legitimate, but which have prevailed on the dynamics of a society undergoing modernization.
few pennies of inheritance, according to Lotti, for conservative thought in the following of the century: "Some elements survived in the tradition of moderate liberalism, shocked by World War I and even overwhelmed by the second postwar period. "Defeated or subordinates in Giolittismo centrism and the Conservatives for Scoppola now have a new chance:" The political question at the end of this discussion is whether, Moro died out with every possible centrist synthesis, the time has come to a polarization of political where 'religious interests' are borne fairly by all Catholics in spite of political divisions. "A new political phase, also according to Lotti" in theory makes it possible not bipartisanship, but the bipolarity. One hypothesis is not unrealistic now, especially in an international novel. "I mean, held after the post-communist, the 'what' of the millennium could be the Conservative Party.
__________________
Italians are individual genes that form, together, a people politically disorganized and immature.
A community so amazing to make an overall problem. A. Lattuada
Monday, September 6, 2010
Electric Box 2 Level 31
intervention integral to Fini Mirabello
Dear friends and dear friends of Mirabello, every time I got to take the word in this small town in the province of Ferrara, who is dear to me for many reasons, and every time in these years I have had ways to address the people before the right and then the center- I always felt a certain emotion. For reasons known, because here the roots of a part of my family, because here many years ago, a man certainly capable of looking forward, he pointed to his people, what was then the people of the socialist movement, the need for generation leap. And I think the presence here, along with many others, of a man like Mirko Tremaglia is the most beautiful demonstration of the ideal continuity. Mirabello as a place for me and so many emotions, emotions that over time, there were renewed. The Italian right here has experienced important moments. It was here, with Pinuccio Tatarella, anticipating what became the National Alliance. It was still here, which together with many others, predicted that further change - the so called journalists - that led to the birth of People's liberties. Whenever, for these and other reasons, I turned from this stage to the listeners, and more generally to the Italians, I felt great emotion. But believe me, the emotion of yesterday and the day before yesterday is nothing compared to the emotion I feel at this time. I believe that never ever ever in my heart there was a strong emotion like the one that I feel at this moment. An emotion that comes from the fact that this event, this festival in 2010, became, as is now known to all, a significant event for the whole of Italian politics, not only for fate of the People of Freedom, the center of the Italian right. Mirabello has become, and is, for a day the capital of Italian politics. And I think, dear Vittorio Lodi, this is the best gift you could do and become a gift for anyone who follows the events of national policies.
Sincere thanks, then, to Victor and the family, to all those who in recent days have given rise to debates, thanks to the many women and many men who have reached Mirabello, often for the first time, from all over Talia. It is the spontaneous mobilization of people, which they referred Bellotti, Raisi, Moroni, of a people who is not here because precept, a people who are here because they feel the deep desire to participate, to find a source of pride, belonging, a desire that is characterized primarily by a political commitment to certain values, ideals precise. A nation of men and women who finds herself, in some cases after many years in other cases, we find after a few weeks. So I hope that this square, which gives me strength and I thank you, in this phase of difficulty can be an opportunity for me to make a contribution to clarify what happened and what will happen. What happened in this troubled summer? I do not understand, dear friends and dear friends, if you do not back to the day when it all started. One day is not far away, calendar in hand, but that now seems buried on July 29. When the Political Bureau of the PDL, the highest body of party leaders after a meeting lasting two hours, in my absence, has decreed that my expulsion from the party, a party that I helped create, not because of what I represent as a person, but because of what constituted the great political community that was and is the Italian right. A meeting at the end of which was approved a document that you write word for word that my position and the position of the so-called Finian, was a trickle of dissent, criticism and picks, an attitude of opposition to permanent positions and often in tune with the themes of the left one - and this really is to laugh - to play an active participation in the massacre of the prosecution, and thus - this was the conclusion - Fini is absolutely incompatible with the principles of the People of Freedom. The July 29. And, then, to start to clarify, there was no escape, there has been no division, there was no attitude intended to demolish the People of Freedom. There was in fact my ouster from the party he helped create with a deeply illiberal act, an act with authoritarian, with a act that has nothing to do with that pluralism is one of the guarantees, a condition that a party is genuinely a liberal party in mass. No craziness, no division. An act I have no difficulty in saying that perhaps that was inspired by Black Book of Communism that was delivered when we gave birth to the National Alliance. An act to Stalinist-style to be shown the door without hearing. That document was a brutal suppression of internal dialogue before the dissent, was the attempt to cancel all types of diversity. And then, we reason, we should ask if the People of Freedom, the Liberal Party of mass, in what a little 'was emphatically defined "Party of love" was and is possible to criticize, to express doubts, indicate the prospects? To give some examples, there is no doubt, and who has followed politics in recent months knows, that for me there were a few occasions of critical questions, but opening up prospects, and made proposals. I think it's only natural when you are in a large party that wants to be liberal and mass. You can advance the criticism and say, for example, that in the face of a government that had done well in many ways against the financial crisis. It is true that we are a priori against the action of the executive, it would be ridiculous. There are friends of the People of Liberty Future leaders of freedom and who are in the Berlusconi government. A government that has done well against the financial crisis, perhaps in a different way could modulate some interventions. For example, could avoid those linear cuts spending, ie cut that was superfluous and unnecessary, and at the same time that it was essential to cut, cuts that have resulted, to cite only two cases, two noisy protests. Protests by working people, women and men who could be here, and in some cases are here. I was injured in Venice when I saw the police forced to show their disapproval.
I think every manager deserves respect, all Italian citizens affected by those cuts were not made. And I also think the budget cuts to school, because of the protest of the precarious still do not know if in a few days, will resume when the school year, there will be a chair for them. Demolition is not a criticism of the government. It is the finding of fact that action must be taken when working knowing full well what the consequences might be. Then, you may criticizing, expressing doubts? As those not on fiscal federalism, but on its actual costs, its timing, because there is no doubt that fiscal federalism can be a major reform for the whole of Italy, but at times it seemed that it was not . It is reasonable to think that the prospects for the PDL not shared by all. For example, when it comes to combating illegal immigration, and it's sacrosanct, it should also give the perspective of immigrants' honest. And yet, the most serious issue, the guarantor is a sacrosanct principle, but never, ever be considered a sort of impunity permanent guarantee of the accused, of course, but the processes must take place. All this is heresy, and defeatism? It is dripping polemical point out that the Italian judiciary is a cornerstone of our democracy? You can not because a few bad apples contest that remains the defense of our Republic. It's a trickle to say that we are a great national party and that, precisely because it must take to heart the interests of all, from Innsbruck to Lampedusa, can not flatten the positions certainly important as an ally of the League but only has a regional dimension? When we say that it was not an act of great foresight on the part of the PDL, to give a reason Bossi, satisfy one thousand milk producers overshoot their quotas to the detriment of many honest farmers? The PDL had to be a great national party, a great Western party, with specific reference values: freedom, respect and human dignity. And if I had not been expelled from the PDL would have told you what I say now, after seeing the spectacle of a little decent Gaddafi in Rome a character who has nothing to teach us. As a former foreign minister know the reasons of realpolitik, I can even get to say that there may be a portion of realpolitik dictated by a legitimate calculation of interests, from a logic of a financial nature. But this can not lead to a kind of genuflection.
So, still, you can say within the PDL, as I said before, that there is a definite must for those who have institutional responsibilities, to respect the other institutions? When the premier asked that it be granted due respect, he must recognize the other, above the head of state representing the Constitution. And we must respect the Parliament, which is an annex of the executive. And I say that as chairman of the House, but because the powers must be balanced. You say that dripping rule is a noble and arduous undertaking, but can never mean control? Yes, because grooming is to understand the reasons for all and ensure balance. And always to be clear: it was dripping, provocation, boycott, stressing that the PDL should be guaranteed the opportunity to carry out the major reforms of a constitutional, economic, social? True, the crisis was an obstacle. But because we no longer speak of the need for major reform, from that of the Constitutional Charter, which can really put an end to this endless transition and give rise to the very dawn of a new republic? We had designed the PDL to maintain the existing, but as a force for truth and authentic change.
And, again, was proof of preconceived hostility to reiterate that at this stage of crisis - which is even more essential commitment to a policy aimed at ensuring a better pace of social justice. Over the past two years, from this point of view has changed little. And that revolution based on merit, with which they filled the streets during the election campaign as soon as possible to become not only a commitment but a political act achieved day by day with all the interventions designed to help those who are more capable. And I think I have the right to ask awkward questions from my community and this policy also do not think he deserved the gesture of annoyed and angry people who said it was incompatible with the PDL. The Prime Minister, I say this without irony, has many merits, but also some flaws: first, to not understand that in a liberal democracy can not exist because there may be heresy to orthodoxy. We are all grateful for what he did in '94, for defeating the so-called war machine, but gratitude does not mean that there can be no comparison, that the distinction should be charged with treason, because we are a nation of subjects. I have challenged the his ability to confuse leadership with what is the attitude of the owner of a company. Precisely because the PDL has opened horizons of great hope, can not be declassified in the leading edge, but should be a source of ideas, a lung that breathes and gives oxygen to the entire nation. Claiming the opportunity to express opinions, make proposals, criticisms, evaluations do not boycott, but may be internal democracy, the physiology of a liberal party of the masses, not theater of politics. It is possible that the only time that has met the leadership of the PDL has marked the time to initiate the process leading up to July 29? Not detrimental to the day that I consider myself, but a great party that is the PDL and is based on democracy.
Continue in this internal dialogue does not mean betraying the voters because there are many, many moderate voters of the PDL genuinely not satisfied with the affirmation that "we are the party of moderates." There are very many voters convinced that the reason the PDL before the policy is to ensure the public interest, the common good of the polis, the interest of the community, national, not the interest of a party. There are people who do not understand why the PDL instead of working to unite, to share work, to raise the stakes, to determine collisions.
is truly the PDL national. Of course, these voters of the PDL is in many cases women and men who voted the National Alliance, but not all. I am electorate of other political traditions. And we've got the evidence after the expulsion, when they consist of groups of future and freedom. They joined the men and women who had not had anything to do with the political tradition. The
want to do is to thank those Members who had never been in Mirabello. An Fli is not in the sixteenth. Who does not think he understood anything at all. Here is the difficult but necessary attempt not to lose that dream. We must give answers to the many women and many men who read even more pages of policy, which feed on nuisance for newscasts and newspapers, with rare exceptions, almost seem to be photocopies. The country is growing detachment from politics, that of the fences. Fli must be a reference point for many voters in the last election abstained or maybe in the next administration without an alternative, would refrain. Voters are telling us to go forward, trying to defend not only our good reasons, but the original principles, the most authentic of the PDL, which ask us to create a good policy, which is the only antidote to the growing mistrust in institutions. When many people lose faith in politics is the eve of moments that may be more problematic. The PDL, as we had planned and wanted, ended July 29 because it was no longer wish to give life to that exchange of ideas that is the spice of democracy. The PDL is gone, there is now the party of the step. In some ways that the PDL is Strength Italy has widened with some colonel or captain who has just changed and maybe the general is ready to change again. And the fact that the PDL is gone is the reason why is easy to answer the question: what will happen? And it is much easier to answer if we think, rather than if you take the desires or fears. Fli may not return to what is no more, no happen. We do not enter into what is no more, you go forward with our ideas, our commitment, our policy development. Do not we retire to a convent, or wandering err awaiting forgiveness.
parliamentary groups can not be processed - Berlusconi is a man of spirit and will not if - as if they were customers of the stand, if they change the supermarket which hitherto have used then get the prize fidelity. The parliamentarians who are with us they want to do politics, talking with people. We go forward with our ideas, our proposals, it goes without being intimidated by what has been called the "method Boffo" fielded in the last month by some newspapers that should be the business card of the "party of love." And if this is the bad habit, imagine if they were not loving what could happen. Let us not be intimidated, because of intimidation we have experienced very different in years when the threat to the right were quite different. Let us not be intimidated by paranoid and pathetic campaign. Indecent because paranoid and pathetic because they are not aware of the contempt that is mounting in the people.
We look forward to both the judiciary to clarify what and how many lies, and how many such defamation, which and how many hints, such as how many and vulgarity, which and how many actions to create a true Islamic stoning type. Other than the values \u200b\u200bof freedom. It was a disgraceful attitude, not because he turned to me, but to my family, and is typical of the infamous. It goes on and you do to keep faith with the spirit of its origins, it goes on not to betray the spirit of the PDL, we go forward to keep the government commit other errors, you go ahead - and if you take away from the head - without changes in the field without reversals and tactics, because from this point of view, the controversies are a sign of the low level of understanding. It goes convinced, as we are, the need to complete the written agreement with the voters, not to mention any part of the program and without adding some that the program was not there and then it becomes an emergency before which all must stop. It goes on even when the prime minister will present the new deal for next year's legislature, the famous five points - the reform of justice, the South, federalism, taxes and security - it is obvious that our leaders speak loud and clear and speak without distinction between hawks and doves, because we do not care ornithology. We are passionate about political debate, and unlike others we face.
And God forbid: parliamentarians of the Future and freedom, if they want to restore dignity and spirit of that implementation who was the project of the PDL, may object to the tenets of the program? And then we will support women and men free program. But I think that it can not be denied to us as to any congressman or senator of the majority, to ask how to link these objectives of the program. Constructive spirit, we will ask how you want to create this program. Fli not pulling against, but it is the political action of those who want to walk fast to profitably re-establishing the government in a good relationship with public opinion (because there are some signs of fatigue, my friends, not polls or surveys). We'll try to create a pact term, therefore, to fill with concrete facts that separate us from the years when we to vote. It is a "national interest", and therefore we believe it is political adventurism threatens every other day and the other elections as well, perhaps to intimidate and perhaps to settle the score with someone. Governing is hard work, trust in the sense of responsibility of everyone, without exception. Why the failure of this term would be a failure for all: for me, Fli, for Berlusconi. And I think he is conscious Berlusconi. Why so many expressions beyond controversy, when you get a trust so great and you get a parliamentary majority as it had never happened in the history of the Republic, the first thing to do is put the door on those who dissent or maybe it's unpleasant, but govern. We are confident that a deal can ensure the legislature's term. And I think also being aware of Bossi and the League. Bossi understands the moods of the people, is a popular leader. We polemicized is often true. Only those who do not know history, as well as geography, may think that there really Padania! Bossi has understood that the flag raised for first years, even picking up the irony and skepticism of many, federalism may be a flag raising, which would lead to the fulfillment of that historic mission that Bossi has given to his movement . But federalism is only possible if it is in all of Italy. Bossi is real man, knows that the North needs of federalism provided that is in the name of the public. And I can safely say that the bicameral committee of thirty members for fiscal federalism, our Senator Baldassarri is crucial. Then, we discuss along with the League and Forza Italy enlarged meaning of federalism Fair. It's a great question that is not reduced to the ratio of Calderoli and Tremonti. It can be realized as long as you establish standard costs.
The South has everything to gain from a reform in the federal sense, which is essential to assess the costs of the standard regions, because no one can argue that the costs in Emilia Romagna are not the same as those in Calabria. No one defends historical expenditure, under which the authorities were seen to pay their expenses at the foot of the list, but the definition of the parameters of expenditure can not be discussed, as they should discuss the timing of federalism or of what it means equalization fund . Even more so, with this reform must be worthy of an anniversary, the celebration of 150 years of Italian unity, which must be not only the reconstruction of historical events, but the opportunity for a national reform, which does not leave behind some regions, that is not part of an expression of selfishness to the detriment of all. Italy is not only an indivisible interest in the South, but also in the North. And just see what happens outside our nation to realize that if the crisis shakes Greece, Germany, Padania certainly can not survive the crisis of a single European country or overlooking the Mediterranean. Italy has the duty to confirm its unity and to compete with other countries. Has the duty to establish a new pact term, it is no longer a table with two legs, or a managed retirement agreement.
But what happened to that point in the program with which you were taking the applause on the abolition of the provinces? What happened to that point in the program which included the privatization of municipal? It was enough to understand that in some areas became the treasure of a party to align the League the Italian left. The new pact term is no longer just between Berlusconi and Bossi, but in everyone's interest, but also of the League of Silvio Berlusconi. I am convinced that the realism and pragmatism will put aside the stigma, because we do not stop. Needless to say, "do what they want," because we will. They serve no ultimatums because not scare us. Silvio Berlusconi has the sacred right to rule, because it has been chosen by the voters in an unequivocal way and I have no difficulty saying that to think of judicial shortcuts for turning him out, would represent a betrayal of the democratic will. Nobody is against the Alfano Bill or legitimate impediment. We are convinced that we need to answer the question of law that Berlusconi to govern without any interference from iperpoliticizzati segments of the judiciary who want to put him offside. Relying on Dr. Strangelove - that is Mr Ghedini - is incomprehensible. The solution is never found and the problem becomes acute. It should not be made a law ad personam damage the company, but a law to protect the head of government, the head of state that exists in many European countries.
That does not mean impunity, does not mean delete processes, but the suspension of the same. And we do try to have in mind that some reforms are right: how do you process to be opposed to the quick? You have to work for and what we remember about that the EU has repeatedly condemned for their excessive length, often take years to know how it ends. But what is unacceptable is the risk that, when many victims are waiting to know the fate of the process, then remain with absolutely nothing in his hand. The reform must be made to ensure the citizens. Justice reform can not be made against the judiciary, which certainly did not interfere with the task of Parliament. Then we discuss in Parliament, how to guarantee the right to rule on Berlusconi, also discuss with the parties most responsible for the opposition: a demonstration on this point has Casini date. We also discuss the proposals arising from the opposition, without the able advisers to the prince straccino immediately. And I think the proposals made by lawyers as Pecorella, Consolo and current vice president of CSM, Vietti. Let justice reform without result in an enduring short circuit between the political power and the judiciary. It is a huge undertaking, difficult, however, that we must pursue. If sovereignty belongs to the people, sovereignty is expressed in many ways. Here we want to revive a proposal, one of those for whom they say, "Fini said things that bring him close to the left." Popular sovereignty means that people have the right to choose their representatives. If sovereignty is popular belief that people have the right to choose, too. Federalism and justice are major issues, but can not be the only topics of discussion. Why the attention of Italians is not directed only to justice today many Italians are worried about economic conditions.
The Italians, on the north and south, are concerned about the economic and social conditions and the work is not propaganda or demagoguery, or "to do" opposition. Are the problems of families. Fli must do everything to assist the two main themes of federalism and other justice issues that really matter to citizens. Keep in mind that they said the head of state, businesses, workers. Possible that in the five points there is nothing to jump-start the economy and make it competitive? There is an Italy worried. And Berlusconi is right when he speaks of optimism, but optimism can not be only verbal, must be turned into practical action. Why stop the crisis (and our government has done good in this sense), now we have to put the economy. We can not guarantee that the revenues are satisfied with the economy. You need the political courage to restore life to those reforms that were in the original program of the PDL and not hear about, for example, the overcoming of the two false myths of the twentieth century, class struggle and the Mercat. He arrived time to give life to a synthesis, a new pact between capital and labor: producing wealth: putting on the same side of the fence. A proposal that I made at the national direction and fell into nothingness, is a reform of the labor market. We need a policy that understands the needs of our manufacturing world. Small businesses know better than anyone. It is important to remember that the manufacturing base is different from other countries, is based on small and medium enterprises. It cuts the superfluous, but do not skimp on infrastructure, in research, production of cutting-edge excellence. We live in a time when the cultural deposits are worth more - in globalization - the oil fields. We have to invest, although it is clear that the deck is short. It would be easy to say "the government pull out of resources". But we all go from unhappy to say that there is one area where you should invest, and is connected to what the industry can make to the competitiveness of our productive system. Especially for our businesses that export is not enough to think about the relocation of businesses, but one who wants to attract capital and put in a position to invest and to do so.
means to implement the key points of the PDL program. I do not want to sink the knife through butter, but despite the "ghe I think, it seems possible that you still do not know the name of Minister for Economic Development, In what other country would be possible?
is clear that a minister must be able to reason and work with the Minister of Economy. And it is clear that a policy capable of liberalization, a policy that can give life to the pact between generations. Because I think there is another major area in which a center-right government that cares about the national government should not spare himself: it is the youth, in fact there is no parent worthy of the name that is not willing to make a personal sacrifice for the future of their children.
The youth question is central, and my heart is aching for young people that there is an unemployed person in four. There are those who smuggle flexibility that is needed for the economy and businesses, with the permanent insecurity: they forget that in Germany there are so many fixed-term contracts, but there the salaries are not sure how to read to us, but more often full-bodied as those of permanent contracts. And we must realize that the generational pact is as important as the one between North and South if we care about the national government. Because it is not just to serve the help of his grandfather to his grandson to live more peaceful: it is completely turned the world before it was often thanks to the work of his nephew who claimed his grandfather.
Poniamoceli these problems. We ask the boys a commitment and when I say we go and we do not stop, I say this because in recent weeks we have seen how the young to say "try it, do not stop, we are with you." I think it's very nice to see so many girls here tonight and so many guys who still want to believe in a policy that can build their future. The future of freedom. And the first freedom and enable them to see what they are capable. What happened to the meritocratic revolution? Worry about social conditions. I think that should cause concern to all who read the so-called social spending in our country is one of the last countries in Europe. Why go ahead Future and freedom, because they are the foundations that have served to fill a void. You must ask ourselves, as the company has changed dramatically, if social spending must be paid to those groups traditionally weaker or not the time to invest in the family that remains the place where it always gives rise to the transmission of values , it creates the condition for which you feel the children of a community. Need a welfare opportunities for young people, based on the needs of families, especially single-income. Today, the center must be able to translate into reality what had been included in the government program.
intervene with policies to support families also means that if the five points is the reduction of the tax burden we can not just announce it but we must assume the responsibility to make proposals. And we have made these are: act, for example, the so-called family quotient, which makes sure that those who have more children at home or a disabled person then has a tax burden different from others. And it is necessary that everything we talk about it in Parliament, and I am glad that he did such Minister Tremonti. And let's also trying to involve the opposition, if you have ideas to understand even if the concept of national interest has also made inroads there. Greater social justice is dear to all, a big government knows how to take good idea even if the opposition. We take this collection to Italy that works. Italy that works, then that is equivalent to Italy honest, that when they hear about the ethics of duty does not have the attitude of those who shrugs and says, "and cobwebs of the past." It is the ethic that the father teaches his son, and policy needs to feel the duty to practice.
The spirit, the sense of belonging. Enough of this selfishness spread, with Italy this fragmented that no longer charged to the distress of their neighbors. A national policy is not afraid to speak of law as a guarantee for the weak. Why in the world since the world is said that "the law is equal for all" that the guarantee is the weakest, not the most powerful, who can bend it to his interests. This is the center-right. If we believe in these things, do not tire of thanking those who does his duty for the State: and gratitude, and citizenship. Being servants of the state, in Italy we dream, it must be a cause of honor. You can not say that "they are poor who do not know what else to do and then decide to go into law enforcement" means to serve our people, our homeland. And even more convinced than ever, we continue the fight against all forms of crime, including white-collar, wide boys of the neighborhood, who thinks he is granted impunity. We continue the fight for the rule of law, re-launched anti-corruption decree: what costs it back in the spotlight of Parliament? We discuss the advisability of establishing a code of ethics for those who have public positions. By establishing what is legal and what not, but also what is appropriate and what is not. On these and other issues, we work to unite not to divide. On these issues we try to create a policy that marks a quantum leap. The Italians are tired of this perpetual campaign that never ends, this triumph of propaganda, this daily ordeal. Fli we are looking forward to join, we are convinced that these issues, with political action that starts from the center can be find even more. The Italians are tired of walls and fights, let's stop with the insults, with the appeals fall on deaf ears. We set up a policy that is capable of a burst of pride, a flash in the name of what is right, not what is useful. You know, many have told me: "Who you do it? But wait, you're younger." But I believe that if we want to give Italy the passion it deserves.
utilitarianism Enough, enough with the calculation of the pharmacist, just to wait for better tomorrow. We must throw your heart over the obstacle, you have to make sense of politics and it must be done in the name of our ideas and our conception of politics. Recalling what we had in the heart at 18-20 years, when none of us thought at the entrance to Parliament or institutional positions and no one was driven by utilitarianism, nor was there someone who said: "Wait, you do not agree, you know it is touchy ' . Bearing in mind, as we like to say to young people, that if a man is not willing to fight for their ideas or their ideas are worth nothing or no value him as a man. Then, in the name of a truly liberal center-right National reformer, social, European, and freedom ahead with the Future in Italy!
CREDITS: of the Century Italy & Repubblica.it 
Dear friends and dear friends of Mirabello, every time I got to take the word in this small town in the province of Ferrara, who is dear to me for many reasons, and every time in these years I have had ways to address the people before the right and then the center- I always felt a certain emotion. For reasons known, because here the roots of a part of my family, because here many years ago, a man certainly capable of looking forward, he pointed to his people, what was then the people of the socialist movement, the need for generation leap. And I think the presence here, along with many others, of a man like Mirko Tremaglia is the most beautiful demonstration of the ideal continuity. Mirabello as a place for me and so many emotions, emotions that over time, there were renewed. The Italian right here has experienced important moments. It was here, with Pinuccio Tatarella, anticipating what became the National Alliance. It was still here, which together with many others, predicted that further change - the so called journalists - that led to the birth of People's liberties. Whenever, for these and other reasons, I turned from this stage to the listeners, and more generally to the Italians, I felt great emotion. But believe me, the emotion of yesterday and the day before yesterday is nothing compared to the emotion I feel at this time. I believe that never ever ever in my heart there was a strong emotion like the one that I feel at this moment. An emotion that comes from the fact that this event, this festival in 2010, became, as is now known to all, a significant event for the whole of Italian politics, not only for fate of the People of Freedom, the center of the Italian right. Mirabello has become, and is, for a day the capital of Italian politics. And I think, dear Vittorio Lodi, this is the best gift you could do and become a gift for anyone who follows the events of national policies.
Sincere thanks, then, to Victor and the family, to all those who in recent days have given rise to debates, thanks to the many women and many men who have reached Mirabello, often for the first time, from all over Talia. It is the spontaneous mobilization of people, which they referred Bellotti, Raisi, Moroni, of a people who is not here because precept, a people who are here because they feel the deep desire to participate, to find a source of pride, belonging, a desire that is characterized primarily by a political commitment to certain values, ideals precise. A nation of men and women who finds herself, in some cases after many years in other cases, we find after a few weeks. So I hope that this square, which gives me strength and I thank you, in this phase of difficulty can be an opportunity for me to make a contribution to clarify what happened and what will happen. What happened in this troubled summer? I do not understand, dear friends and dear friends, if you do not back to the day when it all started. One day is not far away, calendar in hand, but that now seems buried on July 29. When the Political Bureau of the PDL, the highest body of party leaders after a meeting lasting two hours, in my absence, has decreed that my expulsion from the party, a party that I helped create, not because of what I represent as a person, but because of what constituted the great political community that was and is the Italian right. A meeting at the end of which was approved a document that you write word for word that my position and the position of the so-called Finian, was a trickle of dissent, criticism and picks, an attitude of opposition to permanent positions and often in tune with the themes of the left one - and this really is to laugh - to play an active participation in the massacre of the prosecution, and thus - this was the conclusion - Fini is absolutely incompatible with the principles of the People of Freedom. The July 29. And, then, to start to clarify, there was no escape, there has been no division, there was no attitude intended to demolish the People of Freedom. There was in fact my ouster from the party he helped create with a deeply illiberal act, an act with authoritarian, with a act that has nothing to do with that pluralism is one of the guarantees, a condition that a party is genuinely a liberal party in mass. No craziness, no division. An act I have no difficulty in saying that perhaps that was inspired by Black Book of Communism that was delivered when we gave birth to the National Alliance. An act to Stalinist-style to be shown the door without hearing. That document was a brutal suppression of internal dialogue before the dissent, was the attempt to cancel all types of diversity. And then, we reason, we should ask if the People of Freedom, the Liberal Party of mass, in what a little 'was emphatically defined "Party of love" was and is possible to criticize, to express doubts, indicate the prospects? To give some examples, there is no doubt, and who has followed politics in recent months knows, that for me there were a few occasions of critical questions, but opening up prospects, and made proposals. I think it's only natural when you are in a large party that wants to be liberal and mass. You can advance the criticism and say, for example, that in the face of a government that had done well in many ways against the financial crisis. It is true that we are a priori against the action of the executive, it would be ridiculous. There are friends of the People of Liberty Future leaders of freedom and who are in the Berlusconi government. A government that has done well against the financial crisis, perhaps in a different way could modulate some interventions. For example, could avoid those linear cuts spending, ie cut that was superfluous and unnecessary, and at the same time that it was essential to cut, cuts that have resulted, to cite only two cases, two noisy protests. Protests by working people, women and men who could be here, and in some cases are here. I was injured in Venice when I saw the police forced to show their disapproval.
I think every manager deserves respect, all Italian citizens affected by those cuts were not made. And I also think the budget cuts to school, because of the protest of the precarious still do not know if in a few days, will resume when the school year, there will be a chair for them. Demolition is not a criticism of the government. It is the finding of fact that action must be taken when working knowing full well what the consequences might be. Then, you may criticizing, expressing doubts? As those not on fiscal federalism, but on its actual costs, its timing, because there is no doubt that fiscal federalism can be a major reform for the whole of Italy, but at times it seemed that it was not . It is reasonable to think that the prospects for the PDL not shared by all. For example, when it comes to combating illegal immigration, and it's sacrosanct, it should also give the perspective of immigrants' honest. And yet, the most serious issue, the guarantor is a sacrosanct principle, but never, ever be considered a sort of impunity permanent guarantee of the accused, of course, but the processes must take place. All this is heresy, and defeatism? It is dripping polemical point out that the Italian judiciary is a cornerstone of our democracy? You can not because a few bad apples contest that remains the defense of our Republic. It's a trickle to say that we are a great national party and that, precisely because it must take to heart the interests of all, from Innsbruck to Lampedusa, can not flatten the positions certainly important as an ally of the League but only has a regional dimension? When we say that it was not an act of great foresight on the part of the PDL, to give a reason Bossi, satisfy one thousand milk producers overshoot their quotas to the detriment of many honest farmers? The PDL had to be a great national party, a great Western party, with specific reference values: freedom, respect and human dignity. And if I had not been expelled from the PDL would have told you what I say now, after seeing the spectacle of a little decent Gaddafi in Rome a character who has nothing to teach us. As a former foreign minister know the reasons of realpolitik, I can even get to say that there may be a portion of realpolitik dictated by a legitimate calculation of interests, from a logic of a financial nature. But this can not lead to a kind of genuflection.
So, still, you can say within the PDL, as I said before, that there is a definite must for those who have institutional responsibilities, to respect the other institutions? When the premier asked that it be granted due respect, he must recognize the other, above the head of state representing the Constitution. And we must respect the Parliament, which is an annex of the executive. And I say that as chairman of the House, but because the powers must be balanced. You say that dripping rule is a noble and arduous undertaking, but can never mean control? Yes, because grooming is to understand the reasons for all and ensure balance. And always to be clear: it was dripping, provocation, boycott, stressing that the PDL should be guaranteed the opportunity to carry out the major reforms of a constitutional, economic, social? True, the crisis was an obstacle. But because we no longer speak of the need for major reform, from that of the Constitutional Charter, which can really put an end to this endless transition and give rise to the very dawn of a new republic? We had designed the PDL to maintain the existing, but as a force for truth and authentic change.
And, again, was proof of preconceived hostility to reiterate that at this stage of crisis - which is even more essential commitment to a policy aimed at ensuring a better pace of social justice. Over the past two years, from this point of view has changed little. And that revolution based on merit, with which they filled the streets during the election campaign as soon as possible to become not only a commitment but a political act achieved day by day with all the interventions designed to help those who are more capable. And I think I have the right to ask awkward questions from my community and this policy also do not think he deserved the gesture of annoyed and angry people who said it was incompatible with the PDL. The Prime Minister, I say this without irony, has many merits, but also some flaws: first, to not understand that in a liberal democracy can not exist because there may be heresy to orthodoxy. We are all grateful for what he did in '94, for defeating the so-called war machine, but gratitude does not mean that there can be no comparison, that the distinction should be charged with treason, because we are a nation of subjects. I have challenged the his ability to confuse leadership with what is the attitude of the owner of a company. Precisely because the PDL has opened horizons of great hope, can not be declassified in the leading edge, but should be a source of ideas, a lung that breathes and gives oxygen to the entire nation. Claiming the opportunity to express opinions, make proposals, criticisms, evaluations do not boycott, but may be internal democracy, the physiology of a liberal party of the masses, not theater of politics. It is possible that the only time that has met the leadership of the PDL has marked the time to initiate the process leading up to July 29? Not detrimental to the day that I consider myself, but a great party that is the PDL and is based on democracy.
Continue in this internal dialogue does not mean betraying the voters because there are many, many moderate voters of the PDL genuinely not satisfied with the affirmation that "we are the party of moderates." There are very many voters convinced that the reason the PDL before the policy is to ensure the public interest, the common good of the polis, the interest of the community, national, not the interest of a party. There are people who do not understand why the PDL instead of working to unite, to share work, to raise the stakes, to determine collisions.
is truly the PDL national. Of course, these voters of the PDL is in many cases women and men who voted the National Alliance, but not all. I am electorate of other political traditions. And we've got the evidence after the expulsion, when they consist of groups of future and freedom. They joined the men and women who had not had anything to do with the political tradition. The
want to do is to thank those Members who had never been in Mirabello. An Fli is not in the sixteenth. Who does not think he understood anything at all. Here is the difficult but necessary attempt not to lose that dream. We must give answers to the many women and many men who read even more pages of policy, which feed on nuisance for newscasts and newspapers, with rare exceptions, almost seem to be photocopies. The country is growing detachment from politics, that of the fences. Fli must be a reference point for many voters in the last election abstained or maybe in the next administration without an alternative, would refrain. Voters are telling us to go forward, trying to defend not only our good reasons, but the original principles, the most authentic of the PDL, which ask us to create a good policy, which is the only antidote to the growing mistrust in institutions. When many people lose faith in politics is the eve of moments that may be more problematic. The PDL, as we had planned and wanted, ended July 29 because it was no longer wish to give life to that exchange of ideas that is the spice of democracy. The PDL is gone, there is now the party of the step. In some ways that the PDL is Strength Italy has widened with some colonel or captain who has just changed and maybe the general is ready to change again. And the fact that the PDL is gone is the reason why is easy to answer the question: what will happen? And it is much easier to answer if we think, rather than if you take the desires or fears. Fli may not return to what is no more, no happen. We do not enter into what is no more, you go forward with our ideas, our commitment, our policy development. Do not we retire to a convent, or wandering err awaiting forgiveness.
parliamentary groups can not be processed - Berlusconi is a man of spirit and will not if - as if they were customers of the stand, if they change the supermarket which hitherto have used then get the prize fidelity. The parliamentarians who are with us they want to do politics, talking with people. We go forward with our ideas, our proposals, it goes without being intimidated by what has been called the "method Boffo" fielded in the last month by some newspapers that should be the business card of the "party of love." And if this is the bad habit, imagine if they were not loving what could happen. Let us not be intimidated, because of intimidation we have experienced very different in years when the threat to the right were quite different. Let us not be intimidated by paranoid and pathetic campaign. Indecent because paranoid and pathetic because they are not aware of the contempt that is mounting in the people.
We look forward to both the judiciary to clarify what and how many lies, and how many such defamation, which and how many hints, such as how many and vulgarity, which and how many actions to create a true Islamic stoning type. Other than the values \u200b\u200bof freedom. It was a disgraceful attitude, not because he turned to me, but to my family, and is typical of the infamous. It goes on and you do to keep faith with the spirit of its origins, it goes on not to betray the spirit of the PDL, we go forward to keep the government commit other errors, you go ahead - and if you take away from the head - without changes in the field without reversals and tactics, because from this point of view, the controversies are a sign of the low level of understanding. It goes convinced, as we are, the need to complete the written agreement with the voters, not to mention any part of the program and without adding some that the program was not there and then it becomes an emergency before which all must stop. It goes on even when the prime minister will present the new deal for next year's legislature, the famous five points - the reform of justice, the South, federalism, taxes and security - it is obvious that our leaders speak loud and clear and speak without distinction between hawks and doves, because we do not care ornithology. We are passionate about political debate, and unlike others we face.
And God forbid: parliamentarians of the Future and freedom, if they want to restore dignity and spirit of that implementation who was the project of the PDL, may object to the tenets of the program? And then we will support women and men free program. But I think that it can not be denied to us as to any congressman or senator of the majority, to ask how to link these objectives of the program. Constructive spirit, we will ask how you want to create this program. Fli not pulling against, but it is the political action of those who want to walk fast to profitably re-establishing the government in a good relationship with public opinion (because there are some signs of fatigue, my friends, not polls or surveys). We'll try to create a pact term, therefore, to fill with concrete facts that separate us from the years when we to vote. It is a "national interest", and therefore we believe it is political adventurism threatens every other day and the other elections as well, perhaps to intimidate and perhaps to settle the score with someone. Governing is hard work, trust in the sense of responsibility of everyone, without exception. Why the failure of this term would be a failure for all: for me, Fli, for Berlusconi. And I think he is conscious Berlusconi. Why so many expressions beyond controversy, when you get a trust so great and you get a parliamentary majority as it had never happened in the history of the Republic, the first thing to do is put the door on those who dissent or maybe it's unpleasant, but govern. We are confident that a deal can ensure the legislature's term. And I think also being aware of Bossi and the League. Bossi understands the moods of the people, is a popular leader. We polemicized is often true. Only those who do not know history, as well as geography, may think that there really Padania! Bossi has understood that the flag raised for first years, even picking up the irony and skepticism of many, federalism may be a flag raising, which would lead to the fulfillment of that historic mission that Bossi has given to his movement . But federalism is only possible if it is in all of Italy. Bossi is real man, knows that the North needs of federalism provided that is in the name of the public. And I can safely say that the bicameral committee of thirty members for fiscal federalism, our Senator Baldassarri is crucial. Then, we discuss along with the League and Forza Italy enlarged meaning of federalism Fair. It's a great question that is not reduced to the ratio of Calderoli and Tremonti. It can be realized as long as you establish standard costs.
The South has everything to gain from a reform in the federal sense, which is essential to assess the costs of the standard regions, because no one can argue that the costs in Emilia Romagna are not the same as those in Calabria. No one defends historical expenditure, under which the authorities were seen to pay their expenses at the foot of the list, but the definition of the parameters of expenditure can not be discussed, as they should discuss the timing of federalism or of what it means equalization fund . Even more so, with this reform must be worthy of an anniversary, the celebration of 150 years of Italian unity, which must be not only the reconstruction of historical events, but the opportunity for a national reform, which does not leave behind some regions, that is not part of an expression of selfishness to the detriment of all. Italy is not only an indivisible interest in the South, but also in the North. And just see what happens outside our nation to realize that if the crisis shakes Greece, Germany, Padania certainly can not survive the crisis of a single European country or overlooking the Mediterranean. Italy has the duty to confirm its unity and to compete with other countries. Has the duty to establish a new pact term, it is no longer a table with two legs, or a managed retirement agreement.
But what happened to that point in the program with which you were taking the applause on the abolition of the provinces? What happened to that point in the program which included the privatization of municipal? It was enough to understand that in some areas became the treasure of a party to align the League the Italian left. The new pact term is no longer just between Berlusconi and Bossi, but in everyone's interest, but also of the League of Silvio Berlusconi. I am convinced that the realism and pragmatism will put aside the stigma, because we do not stop. Needless to say, "do what they want," because we will. They serve no ultimatums because not scare us. Silvio Berlusconi has the sacred right to rule, because it has been chosen by the voters in an unequivocal way and I have no difficulty saying that to think of judicial shortcuts for turning him out, would represent a betrayal of the democratic will. Nobody is against the Alfano Bill or legitimate impediment. We are convinced that we need to answer the question of law that Berlusconi to govern without any interference from iperpoliticizzati segments of the judiciary who want to put him offside. Relying on Dr. Strangelove - that is Mr Ghedini - is incomprehensible. The solution is never found and the problem becomes acute. It should not be made a law ad personam damage the company, but a law to protect the head of government, the head of state that exists in many European countries.
That does not mean impunity, does not mean delete processes, but the suspension of the same. And we do try to have in mind that some reforms are right: how do you process to be opposed to the quick? You have to work for and what we remember about that the EU has repeatedly condemned for their excessive length, often take years to know how it ends. But what is unacceptable is the risk that, when many victims are waiting to know the fate of the process, then remain with absolutely nothing in his hand. The reform must be made to ensure the citizens. Justice reform can not be made against the judiciary, which certainly did not interfere with the task of Parliament. Then we discuss in Parliament, how to guarantee the right to rule on Berlusconi, also discuss with the parties most responsible for the opposition: a demonstration on this point has Casini date. We also discuss the proposals arising from the opposition, without the able advisers to the prince straccino immediately. And I think the proposals made by lawyers as Pecorella, Consolo and current vice president of CSM, Vietti. Let justice reform without result in an enduring short circuit between the political power and the judiciary. It is a huge undertaking, difficult, however, that we must pursue. If sovereignty belongs to the people, sovereignty is expressed in many ways. Here we want to revive a proposal, one of those for whom they say, "Fini said things that bring him close to the left." Popular sovereignty means that people have the right to choose their representatives. If sovereignty is popular belief that people have the right to choose, too. Federalism and justice are major issues, but can not be the only topics of discussion. Why the attention of Italians is not directed only to justice today many Italians are worried about economic conditions.
The Italians, on the north and south, are concerned about the economic and social conditions and the work is not propaganda or demagoguery, or "to do" opposition. Are the problems of families. Fli must do everything to assist the two main themes of federalism and other justice issues that really matter to citizens. Keep in mind that they said the head of state, businesses, workers. Possible that in the five points there is nothing to jump-start the economy and make it competitive? There is an Italy worried. And Berlusconi is right when he speaks of optimism, but optimism can not be only verbal, must be turned into practical action. Why stop the crisis (and our government has done good in this sense), now we have to put the economy. We can not guarantee that the revenues are satisfied with the economy. You need the political courage to restore life to those reforms that were in the original program of the PDL and not hear about, for example, the overcoming of the two false myths of the twentieth century, class struggle and the Mercat. He arrived time to give life to a synthesis, a new pact between capital and labor: producing wealth: putting on the same side of the fence. A proposal that I made at the national direction and fell into nothingness, is a reform of the labor market. We need a policy that understands the needs of our manufacturing world. Small businesses know better than anyone. It is important to remember that the manufacturing base is different from other countries, is based on small and medium enterprises. It cuts the superfluous, but do not skimp on infrastructure, in research, production of cutting-edge excellence. We live in a time when the cultural deposits are worth more - in globalization - the oil fields. We have to invest, although it is clear that the deck is short. It would be easy to say "the government pull out of resources". But we all go from unhappy to say that there is one area where you should invest, and is connected to what the industry can make to the competitiveness of our productive system. Especially for our businesses that export is not enough to think about the relocation of businesses, but one who wants to attract capital and put in a position to invest and to do so.
means to implement the key points of the PDL program. I do not want to sink the knife through butter, but despite the "ghe I think, it seems possible that you still do not know the name of Minister for Economic Development, In what other country would be possible?
is clear that a minister must be able to reason and work with the Minister of Economy. And it is clear that a policy capable of liberalization, a policy that can give life to the pact between generations. Because I think there is another major area in which a center-right government that cares about the national government should not spare himself: it is the youth, in fact there is no parent worthy of the name that is not willing to make a personal sacrifice for the future of their children.
The youth question is central, and my heart is aching for young people that there is an unemployed person in four. There are those who smuggle flexibility that is needed for the economy and businesses, with the permanent insecurity: they forget that in Germany there are so many fixed-term contracts, but there the salaries are not sure how to read to us, but more often full-bodied as those of permanent contracts. And we must realize that the generational pact is as important as the one between North and South if we care about the national government. Because it is not just to serve the help of his grandfather to his grandson to live more peaceful: it is completely turned the world before it was often thanks to the work of his nephew who claimed his grandfather.
Poniamoceli these problems. We ask the boys a commitment and when I say we go and we do not stop, I say this because in recent weeks we have seen how the young to say "try it, do not stop, we are with you." I think it's very nice to see so many girls here tonight and so many guys who still want to believe in a policy that can build their future. The future of freedom. And the first freedom and enable them to see what they are capable. What happened to the meritocratic revolution? Worry about social conditions. I think that should cause concern to all who read the so-called social spending in our country is one of the last countries in Europe. Why go ahead Future and freedom, because they are the foundations that have served to fill a void. You must ask ourselves, as the company has changed dramatically, if social spending must be paid to those groups traditionally weaker or not the time to invest in the family that remains the place where it always gives rise to the transmission of values , it creates the condition for which you feel the children of a community. Need a welfare opportunities for young people, based on the needs of families, especially single-income. Today, the center must be able to translate into reality what had been included in the government program.
intervene with policies to support families also means that if the five points is the reduction of the tax burden we can not just announce it but we must assume the responsibility to make proposals. And we have made these are: act, for example, the so-called family quotient, which makes sure that those who have more children at home or a disabled person then has a tax burden different from others. And it is necessary that everything we talk about it in Parliament, and I am glad that he did such Minister Tremonti. And let's also trying to involve the opposition, if you have ideas to understand even if the concept of national interest has also made inroads there. Greater social justice is dear to all, a big government knows how to take good idea even if the opposition. We take this collection to Italy that works. Italy that works, then that is equivalent to Italy honest, that when they hear about the ethics of duty does not have the attitude of those who shrugs and says, "and cobwebs of the past." It is the ethic that the father teaches his son, and policy needs to feel the duty to practice.
The spirit, the sense of belonging. Enough of this selfishness spread, with Italy this fragmented that no longer charged to the distress of their neighbors. A national policy is not afraid to speak of law as a guarantee for the weak. Why in the world since the world is said that "the law is equal for all" that the guarantee is the weakest, not the most powerful, who can bend it to his interests. This is the center-right. If we believe in these things, do not tire of thanking those who does his duty for the State: and gratitude, and citizenship. Being servants of the state, in Italy we dream, it must be a cause of honor. You can not say that "they are poor who do not know what else to do and then decide to go into law enforcement" means to serve our people, our homeland. And even more convinced than ever, we continue the fight against all forms of crime, including white-collar, wide boys of the neighborhood, who thinks he is granted impunity. We continue the fight for the rule of law, re-launched anti-corruption decree: what costs it back in the spotlight of Parliament? We discuss the advisability of establishing a code of ethics for those who have public positions. By establishing what is legal and what not, but also what is appropriate and what is not. On these and other issues, we work to unite not to divide. On these issues we try to create a policy that marks a quantum leap. The Italians are tired of this perpetual campaign that never ends, this triumph of propaganda, this daily ordeal. Fli we are looking forward to join, we are convinced that these issues, with political action that starts from the center can be find even more. The Italians are tired of walls and fights, let's stop with the insults, with the appeals fall on deaf ears. We set up a policy that is capable of a burst of pride, a flash in the name of what is right, not what is useful. You know, many have told me: "Who you do it? But wait, you're younger." But I believe that if we want to give Italy the passion it deserves.
utilitarianism Enough, enough with the calculation of the pharmacist, just to wait for better tomorrow. We must throw your heart over the obstacle, you have to make sense of politics and it must be done in the name of our ideas and our conception of politics. Recalling what we had in the heart at 18-20 years, when none of us thought at the entrance to Parliament or institutional positions and no one was driven by utilitarianism, nor was there someone who said: "Wait, you do not agree, you know it is touchy ' . Bearing in mind, as we like to say to young people, that if a man is not willing to fight for their ideas or their ideas are worth nothing or no value him as a man. Then, in the name of a truly liberal center-right National reformer, social, European, and freedom ahead with the Future in Italy!
CREDITS: of the Century Italy & Repubblica.it
Sunday, September 5, 2010
Keratin Treatment Amman Jordan
The appointment at the time of T9
Hello fbi do that? What are you manuring doing? I think sense of what to do tonight. I do not know what I would do Jews if we go out together tonight hurricane. For now I'm hot as class just drink a glass of water . See you later, say hi den Anto!
Music on air: Lady Gaga - Eh Eh
Saturday, September 4, 2010
12.02.1086 Usb Driver
Foreign Mediterranean: Reflections 'fliniane'
Gaddafi Realpolitik and the dignity of
Gianmario Mariniello
you imagine that Gaddafi is in Paris or Berlin and arranges a meeting with 500 hosts to tell them "become Muslim"? We do not. It is no coincidence Gaddafi certain antics - is the right word - she was doing in Rome, not Paris or Berlin. Long live the Realpolitik, Kissinger's books but does not say that the walkway should be granted to dictators on home soil, under the absolute legality of Rome these days seems to be a Libyan extraterritorial possession. Viva
Affairs, long live the Italy-Libya treaty that has helped us to solve the problem of illegal landings, living materials first Libyan Libyan alive highway will be realized by our entrepreneurs, all alive but the dignity of a country comes first.
We can not imagine a single European leader who goes to Mecca to say "become Christians" would be disrespectful. But we have to feel that Gaddafi in the Town of Christianity calls for the conversion 500 girls and low-cut asunder, carefully selected by a special agency. A conception of women offensive and repugnant. And more: how Islam honors the bombast girl who takes pictures with the Koran resting on the neck?
A serious country would be dissociated, indignant, we will solve everything with the policy of the pat on the back, but in the manuals of Kissinger is not. Viva
Affairs, said. But are we sure that this foreign policy throughout Libya-centric and pro-Russian is really in the interests of Italy? Our Western European partners and will not be excited about this foreign policy Levantine and colorful on the edge of ridiculous. And finally, our country is in danger of losing ground in the salons that matter of foreign policy, in exchange for good relations but more questionable (and trash) with autocrats, dictators and various clowns. The dignity of a nation is a value, economical. No more clowning around.
-
Searching credible foreign policy
Potito Salatto *
Here we go again. Politics is a serious matter and you should be able to do, especially when it comes to foreign policy. It is not scandalized if each country takes into account primarily the economic aspects. It is, however, to know how to deal with so far, especially if political force in forming relationships not just edifying.
Can anyone imagine that France, Germany, Spain, England, America does not have economic interests in Iran, for example? But maybe someone has permission to Ahmadinejad to visit their capital in the manner of Gaddafi, to enhance its unique model of society, religion and democracy in their countries? How will they react
other European countries with a Catholic majority, the solicitation of Libyan leader Kadhafi to Islamize the whole of Europe? And 'it possible that any responsible institution (for example, the foreign minister) is able to adequately respond to this formal and substantive offense occurred in a country the center of Christianity? At other times would have been canceled all scheduled meetings.
The President of the Chamber Gianfranco Fini, for example, canceled the meeting with Gadhafi for the late hour of the latter, showing dignity and respect for his constitutional position. And economic interests? Those would be Survivors quietly and without unnecessary bragging.
Civilizations rise and progress as bearers of values \u200b\u200band well-being. When the values \u200b\u200bfade or disappear, leaving just the well-being, tied to economic cycles alternating may disappear. And with it the same civilization. This is the point of crisis of the West: the absence of values \u200b\u200bon which is the soft underbelly of the Islamic targets, yet disjointed, fortunately, are aimed at the twenty-first century. Riappropriamoci therefore our moral and religious values: they are the only possible dam that will at least postpone our decline. Just be aware of this need to respond. Civilized, democratic, but intelligence.
* EPP MEP and coordinator of Roman Italy
Generation -
because tolerance can not cover Italy's ridiculous
Alfredo Castiglione
Mu'ammar al-Quaddafi, 1 September 1969, took part in the coup organized by the Movement of Free Officers Unionists. He had twenty-eight years. As a representative
extremist wing of the movement, took command in the role of "Chairman of the Council of the Revolution." Here derived from 'the role of commander of the armed forces, and in 1970 became Prime Minister.
Qaddafi was known for his intransigence towards foreigners and imposed: the evacuation of British and U.S. bases, the nationalization of the oil giant BP and the expropriation of the total assets of the community 'Italian. Then, with large oil revenues, saw to finance revolutionary movements worldwide. The rest
'history as we know, from the radical pan-Arabism, suspicion of fomenting terrorism, culminating in the melee with the United States, which President Reagan ended with a surgical bombing, where Gaddafi managed' to escape by a whisker.
Colonel exchange 'route. Heads' that the road was steep and no exit, and publicly made amends, getting from the United States cancellation by rogue states.
The man we see in these days and 'on to seventy, with forty of power on the shoulders, as well as' bizarre.
not forget the character of Colonel during these decades of power. Always prone to provocation, the plot twists, shocks to the theater, to the whims. A man who kept his promises, which overturned a sense of history, who came to walk on the paradoxes, where he felt at ease.
But Italy and 'a neighbor across the country of Libya and Libya, as well as being a country colonized by the Italians, and' also a huge wealth of natural reserves of fuel. In addition to a country to modernize. And Libya pass routes of traffickers of human lives directly in Italy.
short, a country with which to deal. And ours is' one of the few nations that can talk.
But the Colonel does pay a penalty in that dialogue, based on the brunt of its past and our history of colonization and "European". It seems that his behavior these days, are a mixture of exhibitionism and visceral anger, desire to impress and wants to humiliate.
The line between folklore and culture of a people in a unique blend that makes puzzled observers and then the Italians.
a tolerant people, our own, which hears appeals to Europe to convert Islam, specified in the capital of Catholicism. Appeals come from an individual who has no beneficial 'religious issuing them. So why are only invited on an individual, as sterile ultravelleitari.
But what is striking, and 'the frame. With more than 500 girls ready 'for a casting, which for a conference.
Also, at this point, one wonders why 'the non-convening of the male. 'Cause discrimination against men?
This too 'provocative. The Islamic religion, which has always had a macho characterization now places the woman in the spotlight. It celebrates almost superiority '.
And so 'the colonel's presidential guard, which should also serve as a human shield in case of danger, and therefore the life of Colonel, and' in the hands of females, and then the Amazons, the girls that Libyan leader is a lesson in cultural-religious.
What to say? What do you think? Confusing. A heap of contradictions.
It must be very thick if a leader of the PDL, Wolves, ends up having the same opinion of his most 'strenuous opposition politicians.
takes these comments to see Colonel Gaddafi. And we, with our legal culture and institutions, giving a limit. Why 'no tolerance can 'to cover Italy and the Italians of ridicule from the world.
-
Our foreign policy in the Mediterranean and the relationship with Libya
Gianluca Sadun Bordoni
fades While the clamor for the provocations of Colonel Gaddafi and capitalize the advantages that cooperation with Libya produces for our country, you can groped a first reflection, more detached, covering the whole of our foreign policy in the Mediterranean and the relationship with Libya.
Comparatively, the distances are smaller in the center-right, foreign policy, compared to other areas. It must be recognized to the Government and our diplomacy to have Having worked in general always clear the national interest. I do not think it right here to be confused with criticism of the opposition, aiming to ridicule our foreign policy. And that beyond some questionable behavior of Berlusconi ("the diplomacy of the cuckoo," he calls himself) or dell'acquiescenza shown against the unpredictable Gaddafi (which the UN a year ago, did not behave much better ).
As for the Mediterranean, so important for us, there is no denying that have been achieved some important results: it is not easy to be greeted with equal enthusiasm in Jerusalem and Tripoli. The strong support given to Israel is big news in Italian foreign policy. It should also give a summary on the government to have kept some solid strategic choices, such as the openness of Turkey's European Union (here the league has had less influence than elsewhere).
One can only observe that Italy (but this is not just the current government) invests a greater extent in bilateral relations, which is likely to bring concrete results, not a character in action 'regional', which requires time longer. In the Mediterranean, the initiative in a regional sense has always been more English and French and Italian not by chance, the first experiment euro-Mediterranean partnership is called 'Barcelona Process', from the city when it was launched in 1995 on a strong English initiative and the revitalization of the partnership, which took the name Union for the Mediterranean, has been thought and wanted President Sarkozy, who held a baptism in Paris in July 2008. In this regional policy of Europe towards the Mediterranean, Italy has always played a marginal role, although it may furnish a partial consolation that the successes of this policy was rather low. The fact remains that it is the EU's Mediterranean policy and that Italy would all titles (and interest) to play a leading role. One can hope that the Minister Frattini, flew to Tripoli for the summit of the countries of the Western Mediterranean, will be able to define a stronger for Italy, at least in this 'forum' sub-regional level.
Within the Arab world, a country that has most fiercely resisted European policy was Libya. And so here we go back to Gaddafi. Libya did not join the Barcelona Process and was fiercely opposed, more recently, the project of Sarkozy. Before the summit in Paris on 13 July 2008, Qadhafi convened a meeting in Tripoli (June 10), attended by the President of Algeria, the Syrian, the Prime Minister of Morocco and Mauritania, to boycott the French initiative, still considered too 'Eurocentric'. While preparing to sign the treaty of friendship between Italy and Libya, which we have just celebrated two years, Gadhafi objected so strongly to the European Union's Mediterranean policy. E 'in the light of this attitude which should be considered the' vision 'of the Mediterranean tumbler during his visit to Rome by the Libyan leader, who wants to expel from the Mare Nostrum American ally and kept under blackmail Europe, threatening to leave the buried black tide of immigration. Here the condescension shown towards Gaddafi is much more problematic than ostentatious against ridiculous call to conversion the hostess.
does not escape the difference here with the attitude of Mr Fini, in an earlier visit to Gaddafi in Rome in July 2009. Because of the delay dell'ingiustificato Colonel, you will recall, Fini then canceled the meeting. The text of which should have taken, however, was delivered to the press and it Fini replied harshly anti-Americanism of the Colonel: "The democracies, from the American, might be wrong, but it certainly can not be compared to terrorists." And in relation to the Israeli-Palestinian peace process: "I want to emphasize the Leader Gaddafi that the development of the Union for the Mediterranean - Of which Israel and the Palestinian Authority are part of a title - may encourage the achievement of peace in the Middle East and the accession of Libya would strengthen such a possibility. "
pity that the Colonel could not hear these words then, and that nobody in the Italian government, has felt the need to oppose the other day concepts similar to the aggressive, anti-American, but in fact even anti-European vision of the Mediterranean ye say Gaddafi. The usefulness of the Italian-Libyan cooperation was not questioned, and Italy have been shown to be a partner able to demand respect from all political parties.
CREDITS: GenerazioneItalia 
Gaddafi Realpolitik and the dignity of
Gianmario Mariniello
you imagine that Gaddafi is in Paris or Berlin and arranges a meeting with 500 hosts to tell them "become Muslim"? We do not. It is no coincidence Gaddafi certain antics - is the right word - she was doing in Rome, not Paris or Berlin. Long live the Realpolitik, Kissinger's books but does not say that the walkway should be granted to dictators on home soil, under the absolute legality of Rome these days seems to be a Libyan extraterritorial possession. Viva
Affairs, long live the Italy-Libya treaty that has helped us to solve the problem of illegal landings, living materials first Libyan Libyan alive highway will be realized by our entrepreneurs, all alive but the dignity of a country comes first.
We can not imagine a single European leader who goes to Mecca to say "become Christians" would be disrespectful. But we have to feel that Gaddafi in the Town of Christianity calls for the conversion 500 girls and low-cut asunder, carefully selected by a special agency. A conception of women offensive and repugnant. And more: how Islam honors the bombast girl who takes pictures with the Koran resting on the neck?
A serious country would be dissociated, indignant, we will solve everything with the policy of the pat on the back, but in the manuals of Kissinger is not. Viva
Affairs, said. But are we sure that this foreign policy throughout Libya-centric and pro-Russian is really in the interests of Italy? Our Western European partners and will not be excited about this foreign policy Levantine and colorful on the edge of ridiculous. And finally, our country is in danger of losing ground in the salons that matter of foreign policy, in exchange for good relations but more questionable (and trash) with autocrats, dictators and various clowns. The dignity of a nation is a value, economical. No more clowning around.
-
Searching credible foreign policy
Potito Salatto *
Here we go again. Politics is a serious matter and you should be able to do, especially when it comes to foreign policy. It is not scandalized if each country takes into account primarily the economic aspects. It is, however, to know how to deal with so far, especially if political force in forming relationships not just edifying.
Can anyone imagine that France, Germany, Spain, England, America does not have economic interests in Iran, for example? But maybe someone has permission to Ahmadinejad to visit their capital in the manner of Gaddafi, to enhance its unique model of society, religion and democracy in their countries? How will they react
other European countries with a Catholic majority, the solicitation of Libyan leader Kadhafi to Islamize the whole of Europe? And 'it possible that any responsible institution (for example, the foreign minister) is able to adequately respond to this formal and substantive offense occurred in a country the center of Christianity? At other times would have been canceled all scheduled meetings.
The President of the Chamber Gianfranco Fini, for example, canceled the meeting with Gadhafi for the late hour of the latter, showing dignity and respect for his constitutional position. And economic interests? Those would be Survivors quietly and without unnecessary bragging.
Civilizations rise and progress as bearers of values \u200b\u200band well-being. When the values \u200b\u200bfade or disappear, leaving just the well-being, tied to economic cycles alternating may disappear. And with it the same civilization. This is the point of crisis of the West: the absence of values \u200b\u200bon which is the soft underbelly of the Islamic targets, yet disjointed, fortunately, are aimed at the twenty-first century. Riappropriamoci therefore our moral and religious values: they are the only possible dam that will at least postpone our decline. Just be aware of this need to respond. Civilized, democratic, but intelligence.
* EPP MEP and coordinator of Roman Italy
Generation -
because tolerance can not cover Italy's ridiculous
Alfredo Castiglione
Mu'ammar al-Quaddafi, 1 September 1969, took part in the coup organized by the Movement of Free Officers Unionists. He had twenty-eight years. As a representative
extremist wing of the movement, took command in the role of "Chairman of the Council of the Revolution." Here derived from 'the role of commander of the armed forces, and in 1970 became Prime Minister.
Qaddafi was known for his intransigence towards foreigners and imposed: the evacuation of British and U.S. bases, the nationalization of the oil giant BP and the expropriation of the total assets of the community 'Italian. Then, with large oil revenues, saw to finance revolutionary movements worldwide. The rest
'history as we know, from the radical pan-Arabism, suspicion of fomenting terrorism, culminating in the melee with the United States, which President Reagan ended with a surgical bombing, where Gaddafi managed' to escape by a whisker.
Colonel exchange 'route. Heads' that the road was steep and no exit, and publicly made amends, getting from the United States cancellation by rogue states.
The man we see in these days and 'on to seventy, with forty of power on the shoulders, as well as' bizarre.
not forget the character of Colonel during these decades of power. Always prone to provocation, the plot twists, shocks to the theater, to the whims. A man who kept his promises, which overturned a sense of history, who came to walk on the paradoxes, where he felt at ease.
But Italy and 'a neighbor across the country of Libya and Libya, as well as being a country colonized by the Italians, and' also a huge wealth of natural reserves of fuel. In addition to a country to modernize. And Libya pass routes of traffickers of human lives directly in Italy.
short, a country with which to deal. And ours is' one of the few nations that can talk.
But the Colonel does pay a penalty in that dialogue, based on the brunt of its past and our history of colonization and "European". It seems that his behavior these days, are a mixture of exhibitionism and visceral anger, desire to impress and wants to humiliate.
The line between folklore and culture of a people in a unique blend that makes puzzled observers and then the Italians.
a tolerant people, our own, which hears appeals to Europe to convert Islam, specified in the capital of Catholicism. Appeals come from an individual who has no beneficial 'religious issuing them. So why are only invited on an individual, as sterile ultravelleitari.
But what is striking, and 'the frame. With more than 500 girls ready 'for a casting, which for a conference.
Also, at this point, one wonders why 'the non-convening of the male. 'Cause discrimination against men?
This too 'provocative. The Islamic religion, which has always had a macho characterization now places the woman in the spotlight. It celebrates almost superiority '.
And so 'the colonel's presidential guard, which should also serve as a human shield in case of danger, and therefore the life of Colonel, and' in the hands of females, and then the Amazons, the girls that Libyan leader is a lesson in cultural-religious.
What to say? What do you think? Confusing. A heap of contradictions.
It must be very thick if a leader of the PDL, Wolves, ends up having the same opinion of his most 'strenuous opposition politicians.
takes these comments to see Colonel Gaddafi. And we, with our legal culture and institutions, giving a limit. Why 'no tolerance can 'to cover Italy and the Italians of ridicule from the world.
-
Our foreign policy in the Mediterranean and the relationship with Libya
Gianluca Sadun Bordoni
fades While the clamor for the provocations of Colonel Gaddafi and capitalize the advantages that cooperation with Libya produces for our country, you can groped a first reflection, more detached, covering the whole of our foreign policy in the Mediterranean and the relationship with Libya.
Comparatively, the distances are smaller in the center-right, foreign policy, compared to other areas. It must be recognized to the Government and our diplomacy to have Having worked in general always clear the national interest. I do not think it right here to be confused with criticism of the opposition, aiming to ridicule our foreign policy. And that beyond some questionable behavior of Berlusconi ("the diplomacy of the cuckoo," he calls himself) or dell'acquiescenza shown against the unpredictable Gaddafi (which the UN a year ago, did not behave much better ).
As for the Mediterranean, so important for us, there is no denying that have been achieved some important results: it is not easy to be greeted with equal enthusiasm in Jerusalem and Tripoli. The strong support given to Israel is big news in Italian foreign policy. It should also give a summary on the government to have kept some solid strategic choices, such as the openness of Turkey's European Union (here the league has had less influence than elsewhere).
One can only observe that Italy (but this is not just the current government) invests a greater extent in bilateral relations, which is likely to bring concrete results, not a character in action 'regional', which requires time longer. In the Mediterranean, the initiative in a regional sense has always been more English and French and Italian not by chance, the first experiment euro-Mediterranean partnership is called 'Barcelona Process', from the city when it was launched in 1995 on a strong English initiative and the revitalization of the partnership, which took the name Union for the Mediterranean, has been thought and wanted President Sarkozy, who held a baptism in Paris in July 2008. In this regional policy of Europe towards the Mediterranean, Italy has always played a marginal role, although it may furnish a partial consolation that the successes of this policy was rather low. The fact remains that it is the EU's Mediterranean policy and that Italy would all titles (and interest) to play a leading role. One can hope that the Minister Frattini, flew to Tripoli for the summit of the countries of the Western Mediterranean, will be able to define a stronger for Italy, at least in this 'forum' sub-regional level.
Within the Arab world, a country that has most fiercely resisted European policy was Libya. And so here we go back to Gaddafi. Libya did not join the Barcelona Process and was fiercely opposed, more recently, the project of Sarkozy. Before the summit in Paris on 13 July 2008, Qadhafi convened a meeting in Tripoli (June 10), attended by the President of Algeria, the Syrian, the Prime Minister of Morocco and Mauritania, to boycott the French initiative, still considered too 'Eurocentric'. While preparing to sign the treaty of friendship between Italy and Libya, which we have just celebrated two years, Gadhafi objected so strongly to the European Union's Mediterranean policy. E 'in the light of this attitude which should be considered the' vision 'of the Mediterranean tumbler during his visit to Rome by the Libyan leader, who wants to expel from the Mare Nostrum American ally and kept under blackmail Europe, threatening to leave the buried black tide of immigration. Here the condescension shown towards Gaddafi is much more problematic than ostentatious against ridiculous call to conversion the hostess.
does not escape the difference here with the attitude of Mr Fini, in an earlier visit to Gaddafi in Rome in July 2009. Because of the delay dell'ingiustificato Colonel, you will recall, Fini then canceled the meeting. The text of which should have taken, however, was delivered to the press and it Fini replied harshly anti-Americanism of the Colonel: "The democracies, from the American, might be wrong, but it certainly can not be compared to terrorists." And in relation to the Israeli-Palestinian peace process: "I want to emphasize the Leader Gaddafi that the development of the Union for the Mediterranean - Of which Israel and the Palestinian Authority are part of a title - may encourage the achievement of peace in the Middle East and the accession of Libya would strengthen such a possibility. "
pity that the Colonel could not hear these words then, and that nobody in the Italian government, has felt the need to oppose the other day concepts similar to the aggressive, anti-American, but in fact even anti-European vision of the Mediterranean ye say Gaddafi. The usefulness of the Italian-Libyan cooperation was not questioned, and Italy have been shown to be a partner able to demand respect from all political parties.
CREDITS: GenerazioneItalia
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)